Jose R. Cadavid

Badge #9085, Hispanic Male, 41
Police Officer at 79th Precinct since March 2018
Also served at 28th Precinct
Service started July 2006, made $187,000 last year, Tax #941483

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory arrest

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2017-17532
Closed: 10/30/2017
Case: 2015-14514
Closed: 10/20/2015

View Details

Lawsuit Settlements:
$15,000   Varick, Tyrone vs City of New York, et al., 2019 KCSC KCSC 510311/2019
$25,000   Armstead, Dynasty vs City of New York, et al., 2015 KCSC KCSC 158421/2015
View Details

Complaints

6 Complaints
10 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Charges)
1 Complainant Uncooperative
1 Exonerated
2 Unable to Determine
3 Unfounded
2 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #202504637, April 2025
Allegation: Force: Chokehold
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Force: Restricted Breathing
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
additional details

Complaint #202006821, September 2020
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #201903941, May 2019
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Black Female, 75
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: Black Female, 75
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201701952, March 2017
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black, 44
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Force: Handcuffs too tight
Complainant: Black, 44
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black, 44
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #201406854, July 2014
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 47
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #200900336, February 2009
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory arrest
Complainant: Black Male, 49
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #202504637, April 2025
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Chokehold Black Male, 40-44 Unable to Determine
Force: Restricted Breathing Black Male, 40-44 Unable to Determine
additional details
Complaint #202006821, September 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 50-54 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #201903941, May 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Black Female, 75 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Black Female, 75 Unfounded
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201701952, March 2017
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black, 44 Unfounded
Force: Handcuffs too tight Black, 44 Unsubstantiated
Discourtesy: Word Black, 44 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #201406854, July 2014
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 47 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #200900336, February 2009
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory arrest Black Male, 49 Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2017-17532
Closed: 10/30/2017
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: While off-duty, said Police Officer after striking a pedestrian with his personal vehicle failed to remain on scene and render immediate aid.
  2. Guilty: While on-duty, intentionally made one or more false official statements at an official Department interview
Penalty: Dismissal probation (12 months), vacation days (30 days)

Case: 2015-14514
Closed: 10/20/2015
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: Failed to make activity log entries as required for aided cases.
  2. Guilty: Failed to obtain information of a relative/friend for notification purposes and failed to prepare an aided report worksheet.
  3. Guilty: While on-duty, failed to accompany an unconscious/unidentified individual to the hospital as required.
Penalty: Vacation days (15 days)


Lawsuits

Named in 4 known lawsuits, $40,000 total settlements.

Varick, Tyrone vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 510311/2019, Supreme Court - Kings, May 17, 2019, ended October 4, 2021
$15,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On May 31, 2018, Plaintiff was at his prior residence which he had been allowed to visit to recover some of his property. At the residence, Plaintiff was arrested by police officers despite having court orders allowing Plaintiff to recover his possessions at the property. Plaintiff was charged with criminal trespasssing. Plaintiffs charges were eventually dropped.

Rattray, Wentworth vs Police Officer Cadavid, et al.
Case # 17CV08560, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, April 23, 2018
Complaint
Description: Defendant Officers showed up at Plaintiff's door after he had a dispute with his child's mother regarding visitation. Officers forced their way into the apartment and refused to leave and kept looking for the child who wasn't home. Plaintiff called 911 to have a supervisor report to the scene

Rattray, Wentworth vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 101566/2017, Supreme Court - New York, January 4, 2018, ended April 26, 2018
Zero Disposition

Armstead, Dynasty vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 158421/2015, Supreme Court - Kings, August 17, 2015, ended May 14, 2019
$25,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On or about December 22, 2013, at around 6:20 p.m., Plaintiff was unlawfully and without probable cause arrested in front of 321 West 125th street in Manhattan. During the arrest, Plaintiff was physically assaulted by NYPD officers, leading to injuries on her face, head, and back. Plaintiff was confined for about 1 day, or until December 23, 2013. Plaintiff was not provided with medical care. NYPD Officer Ernesto Crisostomo, Officer Jose Cadavid, Officer Carlos Delrosario, and other unidentified NYPD officers. observed Plaintiff have her constitutional rights violated and did nothing to prevent it; moreover, they forwarded false evidence to prosecutors at the New York County District Attorney’s Office. Plaintif...

Other Documents