Bladimir Garcia
Badge #5599,
Hispanic Male
Police Officer at 48th Precinct since April 2023
Service
started October 2022,
made $75,400 last year,
Tax #975483
Complaints
3
Complaints
4
Allegations
0
Substantiated
1
SRAD Closure
1
Unfounded
2
Within NYPD Guidelines
Complaint #202602712,
March 2026
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Male, 35-39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | SRAD Closure |
Complaint #202501473,
December 2024
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 40-44 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 40-44 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
Complaint #202307694,
July 2023
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Property damaged |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Complaint #202602712, March 2026 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number | Male, 35-39 | SRAD Closure |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202501473, December 2024 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Black Male, 40-44 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Force: Physical force | Black Male, 40-44 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202307694, July 2023 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Property damaged | Black Male, 30-34 | Unfounded |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'SRAD Closure': Strategic Resource Allocation Determination - due to citywide budget cuts, CCRB is no longer able to fully investigate certain cases within its jurisdiction and suspended investigating some types of complaints.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.