Jonathan A. Metelus
Badge #4315,
Black Male
Also served at
1st Precinct
Service
started July 2011,
made $119,000 last year,
Tax #950883
Complaints
3
Complaints
4
Allegations
0
Substantiated
1
Complainant Uncooperative
1
Exonerated
1
Unfounded
1
Unsubstantiated
Complaint #202202080,
March 2022
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Age 21-24 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Complainant Uncooperative |
Complaint #201707093,
August 2017
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Nonlethal restraining device |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Hispanic Male, 32 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Exonerated |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) |
| Complainant: | Hispanic Male, 32 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
Complaint #201308105,
August 2013
additional details
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 35 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unsubstantiated |
| Documents: | Complaint Closing Report |
| Complaint #202202080, March 2022 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest | Age 21-24 | Complainant Uncooperative |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #201707093, August 2017 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Nonlethal restraining device | Hispanic Male, 32 | Exonerated |
| Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) | Hispanic Male, 32 | Unfounded |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #201308105, August 2013 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Discourtesy: Word | Black Male, 35 | Unsubstantiated |
| Documents: | Complaint Closing Report | |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusion definitions.