Ruth Lormil

Badge #4974, Black Female
Sergeant at Candidate Assessment Division since March 2024
Also served at 78th Precinct, 63rd Precinct
Service started July 2005, made $143,000 last year, Tax #938883

Complaints

4 Complaints
6 Allegations
0 Substantiated
2 Unable to Determine
1 Unfounded
1 Unsubstantiated
2 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202307767, July 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital
Complainant: Female, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202306445, May 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital
Complainant: Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
additional details

Complaint #201507883, September 2015
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment
Complainant: Male, 33
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200701289, January 2007
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Property damaged
Complainant: White Female, 46
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #202307767, July 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital Female, 40-44 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202306445, May 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital Male, 45-49 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Male, 45-49 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Male, 45-49 Unable to Determine
additional details
Complaint #201507883, September 2015
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment Male, 33 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #200701289, January 2007
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Property damaged White Female, 46 Unfounded
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Other Documents

Brooklyn DA Disclosure Letter references additional lawsuit 11CV2446