Rafael Beato
Badge #13326,
Hispanic Male
Also served at
40th Precinct
Service
started January 2007,
made $135,000 last year,
Tax #942983
Complaints
2
Complaints
3
Allegations
0
Substantiated
2
Exonerated
1
Unsubstantiated
Complaint #201703371,
April 2017
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Asian Male, 44 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Exonerated |
Complaint #201101688,
February 2011
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Hispanic Male, 34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unsubstantiated |
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
| Complainant: | Hispanic Male, 34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Exonerated |
| Complaint #201703371, April 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Asian Male, 44 | Exonerated |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #201101688, February 2011 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Hispanic Male, 34 | Unsubstantiated |
| Force: Physical force | Hispanic Male, 34 | Exonerated |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Discipline
Case Details:
- Guilty: Failed to properly safeguard prisoner
Penalty: Forfeiture of twenty (20) vacation days
Lawsuits
Komatsu, Towaki vs City of New York, et al.Case # 18CV03698, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, June 18, 2018, ended September 27, 2021
Zero Disposition
Complaint
Description: Plaintiff was waiting in line to attend the public town hall meeting that the Mayor was holding. When the Plaintiff was about to enter the building, the Defendant Officer stopped the Plaintiff from entering and told Plaintiff to wait outside of the line. One of the Defendant Officers claimed that Plaintiff had harassed the HRA and that was why he was not allowed inside. Plaintiff was later standing on the sidewalk when another Defendant Officer came and forcibly shoved the Plaintiff in the chest.