Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Named in 5 known lawsuits, $165,000 total settlements.
Turner, Dante vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 809689/2025E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, April 30, 2025
Cabrera, Johan vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 809179/2025E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, April 24, 2025, ended February 6, 2026
$140,000 Settlement
Gonzalez, Julio & Polanco, John vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 806241/2025E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, April 18, 2025
Rivas, Damien vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 811740/2023E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, August 1, 2023
Complaint
Description: On May 12, 2022, at approximately 8:00 p.m., Plaintiff Damien Rivas, was in obeyance of all local, state and federal rules, regulations, statutes and laws, when he was caused to be unlawfully stopped, detained, battered and assaulted, seized and searched, and falsely arrested by Defendants, including Defendant Officer Brandon Fennel and several unnamed NYPD officers, in the vicinity of the intersection of Westchester Avenue and St. Peters Avenue, Bronx, New York. On said date and time, Plaintiff was lawfully present inside vehicle and driving while in full obeyance of all traffic conditions and regulations, within vicinity of this complained-of- incident. On said date and time, Defendants then illegally approa...
Garcia, Oscar vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 802658/2023E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, March 2, 2023, ended May 24, 2024
$25,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On May 20, 2022, Plaintiff was lawfully driving his girlfriend’s car to his mother’s residence, when he was pulled over by Defendant Police Officers without legal justification. Plaintiff was instructed by Defendant Officers to step out of the car. Defendant Officers then conducted an illegal pat-down search of Plaintiff, with no weapons or illegal contraband recovered from Plaintiff’s person. Defendant officers then handcuffed Plaintiff’s wrists tightly and ordered him to stand at the back of his car. Six additional police officers and detectives arrived on scene and questioned Plaintiff about guns, all without informing Plaintiff of his Miranda rights. Plaintiff then refused a warrantless search of car, at wh...