Richard Lopez
Badge #18664,
Hispanic Male
Service
started January 2005, ended January 2025,
Tax #936983
Complaints
2
Complaints
6
Allegations
0
Substantiated
1
Complainant Unavailable
3
Unable to Determine
2
Within NYPD Guidelines
Complaint #202309481,
October 2023
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 45-49 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 45-49 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 45-49 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera |
| Complainant: | Male, 45-49 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 45-49 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
Complaint #202303099,
April 2023
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Other |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Male, 35-39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Complainant Unavailable |
| Complaint #202309481, October 2023 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Black Male, 45-49 | Unable to Determine |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment | Black Male, 45-49 | Unable to Determine |
| Discourtesy: Word | Black Male, 45-49 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera | Male, 45-49 | Unable to Determine |
| Force: Physical force | Black Male, 45-49 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202303099, April 2023 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Other | Male, 35-39 | Complainant Unavailable |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Discipline
Case: 2010-273
Closed: 4/22/2010
Case Details:
- Pleaded Guilty: Affixed his signature to a criminal court complaint that he did not correctly review and which indicated that he had received the information he was swearing to from the complainant, when in fact he observed the incident.
- Pleaded Guilty: Wrongfully caused an inaccurate instrument to be filed with the New York county criminal court.
Penalty: Vacation days (10 days)