James M. Leo
Service
started July 1998, ended March 2026,
Tax #921493
White Male
Complaints
2
Complaints
4
Allegations
0
Substantiated
1
Exonerated
3
Unsubstantiated
Complaint #200208381,
December 2002
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 57 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unsubstantiated |
| Allegation: | Offensive Language: Race |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 57 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unsubstantiated |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Frisk and/or search |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 57 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unsubstantiated |
Complaint #200006374,
September 2000
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Hispanic Male, 16 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Exonerated |
| Complaint #200208381, December 2002 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Black Male, 57 | Unsubstantiated |
| Offensive Language: Race | Black Male, 57 | Unsubstantiated |
| Abuse of Authority: Frisk and/or search | Black Male, 57 | Unsubstantiated |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #200006374, September 2000 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Hispanic Male, 16 | Exonerated |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusions.
Lawsuits
Jassey, Sulyaman vs City of Ny, et al.Case # 821154/2024E, Supreme Court - Bronx, December 27, 2024
Complaint
Description: On or about July 4, 2014 Plaintiff was approached by Det. Daniel Hull, Lt. Leo James, PO John Reiber, Det. Francisco Leon, Det. Frank Monge, and POs John and Jane Does without justification. POs unlawfully searched Plaintiff and discovered no contraband but nevertheless arrested Plaintiff with excessive force. Plaintiff was taken to the 40th Precinct where he was questioned regarding an alleged robbery. While there POs also made false statements to the District Attorney that they observed Plaintiff committing crimes. That afternoon, POs subjected Plaintiff to a photo lineup where he was the only member wearing a design that matched the victim's description. As a result of POs' unduly suggestive procedure the vi...