Julio A. Acuria

Julio A. Acuria

Julio A. Acuria
Badge #1077, Hispanic Male, 43
Sergeant at 84th Precinct since August 2016, active
Service started January 2004, made $148,000 last year, Tax #933593

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2015-14536
Closed: 5/11/2016

View Details

Lawsuit settlements:
$32,500   Suggs, Shameek vs City of New York et al., 2022 KCSC KCSC 510836/2020
View Details

Complaints

4 Complaints
4 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Lvl Instructions)
1 Complainant Uncooperative
1 Unable to Determine
1 Victim Unidentified

Complaint #202205019, August 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other
Complainant: Female, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
additional details

Complaint #201903610, April 2019
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #201803093, April 2018
Allegation: Force: Chokehold
CCRB Conclusion: Victim Unidentified
additional details

Complaint #201610558, December 2016
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint
Complainant: Male, 47
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Lvl Instructions)
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202205019, August 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Other Female, 25-29 Unable to Determine
additional details
Complaint #201903610, April 2019
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Other Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #201803093, April 2018
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Force: Chokehold Victim Unidentified
additional details
Complaint #201610558, December 2016
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint Male, 47 Substantiated (Command Lvl Instructions)
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2015-14536
Closed: 5/11/2016
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: Sent threatening text messages to a person known to the Department.
  2. Guilty: Caused unauthorized Department computer inquiries to be made that were not related to official Department business.
Penalty: Vacation days (10 days)


Lawsuits

Named in 2 known lawsuits, $32,500 total settlements.

Suggs, Shameek vs City of New York et al.
Case # 510836/2020, Supreme Court - Kings, August 8, 2022, ended September 27, 2022
$32,500 Settlement

Province, Jerry vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 512701/2021, Supreme Court - Kings, July 15, 2021

Other Documents