Julio A. Acuria

Julio A. Acuria

Julio A. Acuria
Badge #1077, Hispanic Male, 45
Sergeant at 83rd Precinct since March 2026
Also served at 84th Precinct
Service started January 2004, made $159,000 last year, Tax #933593

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2015-14536
Closed: 5/11/2016

View Details

Lawsuit Settlements:
$32,500   Suggs, Shameek vs City of Ny et al., 2022 KCSC KCSC 510836/2020
View Details

Complaints

6 Complaints
9 Allegations
3 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Lvl Instructions)
2 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Complainant Uncooperative
1 Unable to Determine
1 Unfounded
1 Victim Unidentified
2 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202501710, February 2025
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #202308471, January 2023
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Female, 60-64
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital
Complainant: Female, 60-64
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Female, 60-64
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Female, 60-64
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202205019, August 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Sex Miscon (Sexual Harassment, Verbal)
Complainant: Female, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
additional details

Complaint #201903610, April 2019
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #201803093, April 2018
Allegation: Force: Chokehold
CCRB Conclusion: Victim Unidentified
additional details

Complaint #201610558, December 2016
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint
Complainant: Male, 47
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Lvl Instructions)
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202501710, February 2025
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Black Male, 25-29 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #202308471, January 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Female, 60-64 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital Female, 60-64 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Female, 60-64 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Female, 60-64 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #202205019, August 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Sex Miscon (Sexual Harassment, Verbal) Female, 25-29 Unable to Determine
additional details
Complaint #201903610, April 2019
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Other Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #201803093, April 2018
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Force: Chokehold Victim Unidentified
additional details
Complaint #201610558, December 2016
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint Male, 47 Substantiated (Command Lvl Instructions)
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2015-14536
Closed: 5/11/2016
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: Caused unauthorized Department computer inquiries to be made that were not related to official Department business.
  2. Guilty: Sent threatening text messages to a person known to the Department.
Penalty: Vacation days (10 days)


Lawsuits

Named in 3 known lawsuits, $32,500 total settlements.

Barrett, David & Douglas, Maegan vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 529090/2024, Supreme Court - Kings, December 19, 2024
Complaint
Description: On or about July 31, 2023 Plaintiffs Barrett and Douglas were in a car with their minor children, with Plaintiff Barret in the driver's seat. As they were traveling POs Vahid Hodzic, Conor McGouran, Julio Acuria, Justin Suarez, Franddy Duran, Karl Virn Williams, Alyssa Strong, Tiagom Reis, and John and Jane Does 1-12 suddenly used their police car to block and surround Plaintiff's car. POs ordered documentation and, when provided, ordered Plaintiff Barrett out of the vehicle. Plaintiff Barrett asked why and POs purposefully shattered the driver's side window and dragged him out of the vehicle. They also pulled one of the children out of the passenger cheat. Plaintiff Barrett was thrown to the ground multiple ti...

Suggs, Shameek vs City of Ny et al.
Case # 510836/2020, Supreme Court - Kings, August 8, 2022, ended September 27, 2022
$32,500 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On June 26, 2017, at approximately 8:30 p.m., the defendant police officers allegedly executed a search warrant inside of plaintiff’s friend’s apartment located at 233 Sands Street, Apt. 3K, Brooklyn, New York. Upon entering the apartment, the defendant police officer asked plaintiff if he lived at the apartment and plaintiff showed the defendant officers his identification indicating he did not reside in the apartment, nevertheless defendant police unlawfully handcuffed plaintiff and arrested him. Plaintiff was then transported against his will to the 84th precinct where he was searched, photographed, fingerprinted, and detained in a filthy holding cell for many hours. Thereafter, the defendant police office...

Province, Jerry vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 512701/2021, Supreme Court - Kings, July 15, 2021
Complaint
Description: On September 17, 2016, while lawfully present inside the Regal movie theater located at 106 Court Street in Brooklyn, NY, the plaintiff was unlawfully approached, questioned, assaulted, battered, arrested, and detained by the defendants, including Delossantos, Acuria, Riker, and John Does 1-2, in an excessive manner without legal justification and solely because of his race and national origin. The defendants aggressively approached the plaintiff by holding their arms outstretched toward him in a threatening and intimidating manner and unlawfully stopped the plaintiff by grabbing his body and limbs without probable cause. The defendants then demanded that the plaintiff produce his government-issued identificati...

Other Documents