Michael D. Dalia

Michael D. Dalia

Michael D. Dalia
Badge #2526, White Male
Detective Grade 3 at Criminal Intelligence Section since July 2021
Service started July 2013, made $174,000 last year, Tax #954693

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card (3)
Abuse of Authority: Frisk (2)
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2022-26887
Closed: 5/2/2024
Case: 2022-26886
Closed: 4/30/2024

View Details

Lawsuit settlements:
$96,000   Bizzell, Kamiyah, et Al vs City of New York, et al., 2022 SDNY SDNY 22CV05745
View Details

Complaints

5 Complaints
21 Allegations
6 Substantiated
6 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
2 Closed - Pending Litigation
4 Complainant Uncooperative
1 Unfounded
7 Unsubstantiated
1 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202301330, January 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Force: Gun Pointed
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #202203700, May 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #202105038, August 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other
Complainant: Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #202102554, April 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline A
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline A
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline A
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 3 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, February 2024
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 3 days / Command Discipline A
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Plea Agreement
additional details

Complaint #201502406, March 2015
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 33
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #202301330, January 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Hispanic Male, 35-39 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Hispanic Male, 35-39 Within NYPD Guidelines
Force: Gun Pointed Hispanic Male, 35-39 Unfounded
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details
Complaint #202203700, May 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property Black Male, 21-24 Closed - Pending Litigation
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 21-24 Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details
Complaint #202105038, August 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Male, 25-29 Complainant Uncooperative
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Male, 25-29 Complainant Uncooperative
Abuse of Authority: Other Male, 25-29 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #202102554, April 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 18-20 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline A
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Black Male, 18-20 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording Black Male, 18-20 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 18-20 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Male, 18-20 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Male, 18-20 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Black Male, 18-20 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline A
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Black Male, 18-20 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline A
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Male, 18-20 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Male, 18-20 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Black Male, 18-20 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Black Male, 18-20 Unsubstantiated
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 3 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, February 2024
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 3 days / Command Discipline A
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Plea Agreement
additional details
Complaint #201502406, March 2015
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 33 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2022-26887
Closed: 5/2/2024
Case Details:
  1. Violated patrol rules.
Recommendation: No disciplinary action

Case: 2022-26886
Closed: 4/30/2024
Case Details:
  1. Violated patrol rules - failed to provide a business card
  2. Wrongfully frisked an individual known to the Department.
Penalty: A - Command Discipline, vacation days (3 days)
Recommendation: Charges and Specifications


Lawsuits

Named in 2 known lawsuits, $96,000 total settlements.

Bizzell, Kamiyah, et Al vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 22CV05745, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, July 13, 2022, ended March 22, 2023
$96,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On May 2, 20020, Kamiyah Bizzell, Gibran Johnson, and Keith Shenery were inside of Teamworkon3 Juices, a juice bar where they worked when over NYPD officers including Officers Dalia, Dooley, and Trahan entered along with Officers John/Jane Does 1-10. They stated they were investigating an alleged violation of Gov Cuomo's executive order prohibiting non-essential gatherings during the Covid-19 pandemic. Ms. Bizzel received a call from Mr. Calvin Brown, the business owner, who stated he was/would watch everything from the security cameras, which NYPD officer John Doe then unplugged. The officers then began searching the premises without a warrant, and claimed to have recovered a loaded 9 mm handgun, and arrested...

Simmons, Sedina vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 157029/2021, Supreme Court - New York, August 5, 2021