Burak H. Altan

Burak H. Altan

Burak H. Altan
Badge #1433, White Male
Sergeant at Transit Bureau Brooklyn since May 2024
Service started July 2011, made $157,000 last year, Tax #949993

Substantiated Allegations:
Discourtesy: Action

Complaints

2 Complaints
3 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Unable to Determine
1 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202302796, March 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
additional details

Complaint #202301897, December 2022
Allegation: Discourtesy: Action
Complainant: White Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital
Complainant: White Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #202302796, March 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital Hispanic Male, 35-39 Unable to Determine
additional details
Complaint #202301897, December 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Action White Male, 40-44 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital White Male, 40-44 Within NYPD Guidelines
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Lawsuits

Mattingly, Sherry, et al. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 15CV00733, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, February 13, 2015, ended October 29, 2015
Zero Disposition
Complaint
Description: On December 15, 2014, plaintiffs were attempting to enter the subway. Defendants ran up to the plaintiffs and threw them against the subway station wall. When plaintiffs protested, a defendant, possibly Manuel Mercedes, took a canister of mace and spread it at one of the plaintiffs. Plaintiff fell to the floor, screaming in pain. The other plaintiff started screaming for help, at which point defendant officer, possibly Daniel Priber, punched her in the eye causing plaintiff to fall to the floor and suffer bruising, swelling, and substantial pain. Defendants arrested plaintiffs and charged them. Plaintiffs were arraigned, and were given an adjournment in contemplation of dismissal.

Other Documents