Christopher G. Daly

Badge #4728, White Male
Sergeant Detective Squad at CEIS Joint Violent Crimes Task Force since October 2024
Also served at Joint Bank Robbery Task Force, 43rd Precinct, 24th Precinct, Warrant Section
Service started August 1998, made $233,000 last year, Tax #922204

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Other
Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2016-15279
Closed: 3/22/2016

View Details

Lawsuit Settlements:
$5,000   Parks, Joyce vs Prestige Management Inc., Nyc, et al., 2017 SDNY SDNY 16CV02072
$30,000   Mcdaniel, Kezian vs City of New York, et al., 2015 SDNY SDNY 15CV06868
View Details

Complaints

8 Complaints
17 Allegations
4 Substantiated
4 Substantiated (Charges)
1 Complainant Uncooperative
2 Exonerated
6 Unfounded
4 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #201505442, April 2015
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
Complainant: Female, 49
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property
Complainant: Female, 49
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat to notify ACS
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Female, 49
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Female
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Female, 49
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other
Complainant: Female, 49
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Not guilty
CCRB Recommended Penalty: Dismissal Probation
APU Trial Commissioner Penalty: Forfeit vacation 8 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Guilty after trial-PC Approved, August 3, 2017
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 8 days
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #200800805, January 2008
Allegation: Force: Hit against inanimate object
Complainant: Black Female, 26
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #200709610, July 2007
Allegation: Force: Hit against inanimate object
Complainant: Black Male, 24
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #200702484, February 2007
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Male, 46
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Male, 46
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #200604739, April 2006
Allegation: Force: Vehicle
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 41
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Force: Gun Pointed
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 41
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #200606502, April 2006
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop
Complainant: Black Male, 35
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #200604814, April 2006
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop
Complainant: Black Male, 18
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #200102051, March 2001
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 20
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #201505442, April 2015
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Female, 49 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property Female, 49 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Threat to notify ACS Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Female, 49 Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty
Force: Physical force Female Unfounded
Force: Physical force Female, 49 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Other Female, 49 Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Not guilty
CCRB Recommended Penalty: Dismissal Probation
APU Trial Commissioner Penalty: Forfeit vacation 8 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Guilty after trial-PC Approved, August 3, 2017
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 8 days
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #200800805, January 2008
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Hit against inanimate object Black Female, 26 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #200709610, July 2007
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Hit against inanimate object Black Male, 24 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #200702484, February 2007
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Male, 46 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Male, 46 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #200604739, April 2006
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Vehicle Hispanic Male, 41 Unfounded
Force: Gun Pointed Hispanic Male, 41 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #200606502, April 2006
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop Black Male, 35 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #200604814, April 2006
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop Black Male, 18 Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details
Complaint #200102051, March 2001
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Hispanic Male, 20 Unsubstantiated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2016-15279
Closed: 3/22/2016
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: While on-duty, improperly entered an apartment without sufficient legal authority.
  2. Guilty: While on-duty, improperly searched an apartment without sufficient legal authority.
  3. Guilty: While on-duty, wrongfully threatened to arrest a person known to the Department.
Penalty: Vacation days (8 days)


Lawsuits

Named in 2 known lawsuits, $35,000 total settlements.

Parks, Joyce vs Prestige Management Inc., Nyc, et al.
Case # 16CV02072, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, June 8, 2017, ended November 21, 2017
$5,000 Settlement
Complaint, Third Amended Complaint
Description: Beginning in 2015, on approximately 6 occasions, Defendant Officers would force their way into Plaintiff's apartment searching for her son.

Mcdaniel, Kezian vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 15CV06868, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, September 2, 2015, ended February 4, 2016
$30,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: Defendant officers approached Plaintiff, mistaking him from his brother, and without asking any questions tased Plaintiff, handcuffed him, and took him to the 9th Precinct. Plaintiff was falsely charged with possession of a gravity knife and resisting arrest, which were eventually dismissed.

Other Documents

NYPD Trial Decision 8/3/2017