Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusions.
Named in 3 known lawsuits, $268,000 total settlements.
Ihim, Uchendu vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 033254/2018E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, November 29, 2018, ended November 4, 2020
$18,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On July 23, 2016, Defendants Sajduk and Moran wrongfully and falsely accused the Plaintiff of the crimes of driving while intoxicated and driving while impaired. On or about July 23, 2016 and from that time until the dismissal of charges, which was a favorable termination for Plaintiff by the Bronx County Criminal Court, Defendants Sajduk and Moran deliberately and maliciously prosecuted Plaintiff, an innocent male without any probable cause whatsoever, by filing or causing a criminal court complaint to be filed in the Criminal Court of the City of New York, Bronx County, for the purpose of falsely accusing the plaintiff of violations of the criminal laws of the State of New York.
Adams, Tyrone vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 17CV01465,
U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, March 10, 2017, ended March 2, 2018
Zero Disposition
Complaint
Description: Police officers entered plaintiff's residence with no warrant.
Barrett, Howard vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 307010/2011,
Supreme Court - Bronx, August 8, 2011, ended June 11, 2019
$250,000 Settlement
