Shemar A. Graham

Badge #17538, Black Male
Police Officer at 114th Precinct since August 2025
Service started October 2022, made $25,800 last year, Tax #975504

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Abuse of Authority: Property damaged
Discourtesy: Action

Complaints

2 Complaints
9 Allegations
3 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
2 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
2 Closed - Pending Litigation
3 Unfounded
1 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202602252, February 2026
Allegation: Force: Other
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
Allegation: Force: Other blunt instrument as a club
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #202304490, May 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording
Complainant: Age 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Discourtesy: Action
Complainant: Age 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Property damaged
Complainant: Age 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Age 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Age 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Age 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Obstructed Shield Number
Complainant: Age 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #202602252, February 2026
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Other Male, 35-39 Closed - Pending Litigation
Force: Other blunt instrument as a club Hispanic Male, 35-39 Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details
Complaint #202304490, May 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording Age 21-24 Unfounded
Discourtesy: Action Age 21-24 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Abuse of Authority: Property damaged Age 21-24 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Age 21-24 Within NYPD Guidelines
Force: Physical force Age 21-24 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Age 21-24 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Abuse of Authority: Obstructed Shield Number Age 21-24 Unfounded
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.