Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Discourtesy: Word
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Discourtesy: Word
Lauren V. Creighton
Badge #22247,
White Female
Also served at
US Open Tennis Detail,
111th Precinct
Service
started January 2018,
made $65,000 last year,
Tax #965014
Discipline Cases:
Case: 2021-24124
Closed: 11/21/2022
Case: 2022-27234
Closed: 11/21/2022
View Details
Complaints
3
Complaints
7
Allegations
2
Substantiated
2
Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1
Exonerated
3
Unfounded
1
Unsubstantiated
Complaint #202103376,
June 2021
additional details
| Allegation: | Offensive Language: Other |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | White Female, 45-49 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unsubstantiated |
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
| Complainant: | White Female, 45-49 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital |
| Complainant: | White Female, 45-49 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Exonerated |
| Penalty: | Command Discipline - A |
Complaint #202102396,
April 2021
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | White Male, 65-69 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number |
| Complainant: | White Male, 65-69 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Penalty: | Command Discipline - A |
Complaint #202007930,
November 2020
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | White Male, 45-49 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name |
| Complainant: | White Male, 45-49 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Complaint #202103376, June 2021 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Offensive Language: Other | White Female, 45-49 | Unsubstantiated |
| Discourtesy: Word | White Female, 45-49 | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital | White Female, 45-49 | Exonerated |
| Penalty: Command Discipline - A | ||
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202102396, April 2021 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name | White Male, 65-69 | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number | White Male, 65-69 | Unfounded |
| Penalty: Command Discipline - A | ||
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202007930, November 2020 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number | White Male, 45-49 | Unfounded |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name | White Male, 45-49 | Unfounded |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Discipline
Case: 2021-24124
Closed: 11/21/2022
Case Details:
- Violated patrol rules - refused to provide name
Penalty: A - Command Discipline
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A
Case: 2022-27234
Closed: 11/21/2022
Case Details:
- Wrongfully discourteous to an individual known to the Department.
Penalty: A - Command Discipline
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A
Lawsuits
Named in 2 known lawsuits.Alsaeidi, Montaser, et al. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 716291/2022, Supreme Court - Queens, August 30, 2022
Tsekenis-Shehas, Anna vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 722924/2021, Supreme Court - Queens, October 18, 2021