Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Discourtesy: Word
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Discourtesy: Word
Lauren V. Layton
Badge #22247,
White Female
Police Officer at Crime Prevention Division since April 2026
Also served at
Transit Bureau Manhattan,
Transit Bureau District 12,
Community Affairs Bureau Community Outreach Division,
US Open Tennis Detail,
111th Precinct
Service
started January 2018,
made $134,000 last year,
Tax #965014
Other names:
Lauren V. Creighton
Discipline Cases:
Case: 2021-24124
Closed: 11/21/2022
Case: 2022-27234
Closed: 11/21/2022
View Details
Lawsuit Settlements:
$45,000 Alsaeidi, Montaser, et al. vs City of Ny, et al., 2022 QCSC QCSC 716291/2022
View Details
$45,000 Alsaeidi, Montaser, et al. vs City of Ny, et al., 2022 QCSC QCSC 716291/2022
View Details
Complaints
3
Complaints
7
Allegations
2
Substantiated
2
Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1
Exonerated
3
Unfounded
1
Unsubstantiated
Complaint #202103376,
June 2021
additional details
| Allegation: | Offensive Language: Other |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | White Female, 45-49 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unsubstantiated |
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
| Complainant: | White Female, 45-49 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital |
| Complainant: | White Female, 45-49 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Exonerated |
| Penalty: | Command Discipline - A |
Complaint #202102396,
April 2021
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | White Male, 65-69 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number |
| Complainant: | White Male, 65-69 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Penalty: | Command Discipline - A |
| Documents: | Complaint Closing Report |
Complaint #202007930,
November 2020
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | White Male, 45-49 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name |
| Complainant: | White Male, 45-49 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Complaint #202103376, June 2021 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Offensive Language: Other | White Female, 45-49 | Unsubstantiated |
| Discourtesy: Word | White Female, 45-49 | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital | White Female, 45-49 | Exonerated |
| Penalty: Command Discipline - A | ||
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202102396, April 2021 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name | White Male, 65-69 | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number | White Male, 65-69 | Unfounded |
| Penalty: Command Discipline - A | ||
| Documents: | Complaint Closing Report | |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202007930, November 2020 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number | White Male, 45-49 | Unfounded |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name | White Male, 45-49 | Unfounded |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusions.
Discipline
Case: 2021-24124
Closed: 11/21/2022
Case Details:
- Violated patrol rules - refused to provide name
Penalty: A - Command Discipline
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A
Case: 2022-27234
Closed: 11/21/2022
Case Details:
- Wrongfully discourteous to an individual known to the Department.
Penalty: A - Command Discipline
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A
Lawsuits
Named in 2 known lawsuits, $45,000 total settlements.Alsaeidi, Montaser, et al. vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 716291/2022, Supreme Court - Queens, August 30, 2022, ended February 22, 2024
$45,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On July 29, 2020, Plaintiffs entered into a partnership agreement for ownership of Jam Juice Vape Shop. On May 17, 2021, Plaintiffs had a business dispute with their partners, and the partners changed the locks to prevent Plaintiffs from entering. Plaintiffs went to the NYPD and met with NYPD Sergeant Jaspreet Gill who told the Plaintiffs that the dispute was civil and NYPD would not intervene, and advised them that they could call a locksmith to have the store's locks changed back. Plaintiffs returned to the store, causing their business partners to call the police. NYPD responded and determined Plaintiffs were lawful co-owners and there was nothing unlawful about their presence there. NYPD facilitated Plainti...
Tsekenis-Shehas, Anna vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 722924/2021, Supreme Court - Queens, October 18, 2021
Complaint
Description: On or about June 6, 2021. at approximately 1:25 PM, at the residence of Plaintiff at 214004 86th Ave, after Plaintiff had requested assistance regarding a domestic dispute via 911, NYPD Officers Creighton, Ippoloti, Felipe, Portalatin and John or Jane Does 1-10 unjustifiably arrested Plaintiff without probable cause. In doing so, they engaged in excessive force and refused to loosen the handcuffs when she complained of excessive tightness. She was detained until June 7, 2021 at or about 4 PM at the 111th Precinct at which time she was released without being charged.