Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Named in 4 known lawsuits.
Huggin, Johnny vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 810499/2023E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, July 11, 2023
Knight, Tahje vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 810019/2023E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, June 29, 2023
Martinez, Reynaldo, et al. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 806015/2023E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, April 18, 2023
Daniels, Dante vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 808766/2022E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, July 5, 2022
