Jayther Liriano

Jayther Liriano

Jayther Liriano
Badge #7542, Hispanic Male
Detective Specialist at Police Service Area 7 since November 2018
Service started October 2017, made $179,000 last year, Tax #964614

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card (7)
Abuse of Authority: Frisk (6)
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera (4)
Abuse of Authority: Question (3)
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number (2)
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Abuse of Authority: Stop
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search (2)
Discourtesy: Gesture
Discourtesy: Word (2)
Offensive Language: Gender

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2023-28995
Closed: 9/13/2023
Case: 2022-25746
Closed: 2/26/2023

View Details

Lawsuit Settlements:
$45,000   Gomez, Hector vs City of Ny, et al., 2025 BCSC BCSC 816035/2025E
$20,000   Huggin, Johnny vs City of Ny, et al., 2023 BCSC BCSC 810499/2023E
$100,000   Daniels, Dante vs City of Ny, et al., 2022 BCSC BCSC 808766/2022E
View Details

Complaints

12 Complaints
51 Allegations
31 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Charges)
1 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
29 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Complaint Withdrawn
2 Exonerated
9 Unable to Determine
1 Unfounded
4 Unsubstantiated
3 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202501566, February 2025
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Complainant: Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - A
Penalty: Command Discipline - A (Warned and Admonished)
additional details

Complaint #202412265, December 2024
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details

Complaint #202310280, October 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Age 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question
Complainant: Age 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - B
Penalty: Command Discipline - B (Vacation: 2 days)
additional details

Complaint #202305059, June 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Age 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Age 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question
Complainant: Age 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Age 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline A
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 3 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, December 2, 2025
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 3 days / Command Discipline A
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Plea Agreement
additional details

Complaint #202303687, April 2023
Allegation: Discourtesy: Gesture
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline A
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline A
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline A
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline A
Allegation: Offensive Language: Gender
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline B
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline A
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 10 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, December 2, 2025
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 10 days / Command Discipline B
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Plea Agreement
additional details

Complaint #202208462, November 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Hispanic, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Hispanic, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Hispanic, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Hispanic, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Hispanic, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Hispanic, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Hispanic, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline A
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 3 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, December 2, 2025
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 3 days / Command Discipline A
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
NYPD Plea Agreement
additional details

Complaint #202208437, June 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline A
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 3 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, December 2, 2025
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 3 days / Command Discipline A
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
NYPD Plea Agreement
additional details

Complaint #202202749, April 2022
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #202201577, March 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
additional details

Complaint #202008000, December 2020
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202005618, July 2020
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #202003500, May 2020
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202501566, February 2025
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Male, 25-29 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - A
Penalty: Command Discipline - A (Warned and Admonished)
additional details
Complaint #202412265, December 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Male, 25-29 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 25-29 Unable to Determine
Force: Physical force Black Male, 25-29 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Black Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Black Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Abuse of Authority: Question Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details
Complaint #202310280, October 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Age 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Question Age 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - B
Penalty: Command Discipline - B (Vacation: 2 days)
additional details
Complaint #202305059, June 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Age 21-24 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Age 21-24 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Question Age 21-24 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Age 21-24 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Stop Within NYPD Guidelines
NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline A
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 3 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, December 2, 2025
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 3 days / Command Discipline A
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Plea Agreement
additional details
Complaint #202303687, April 2023
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Gesture Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline A
Discourtesy: Word Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline A
Abuse of Authority: Stop Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline A
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline A
Offensive Language: Gender Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline B
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline A
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 10 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, December 2, 2025
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 10 days / Command Discipline B
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Plea Agreement
additional details
Complaint #202208462, November 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Hispanic, 45-49 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Hispanic, 45-49 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Hispanic, 45-49 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Hispanic, 45-49 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Hispanic, 45-49 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Hispanic, 45-49 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Discourtesy: Word Hispanic, 45-49 Unable to Determine
NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline A
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 3 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, December 2, 2025
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 3 days / Command Discipline A
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
NYPD Plea Agreement
additional details
Complaint #202208437, June 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Hispanic Male, 45-49 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Discourtesy: Word Hispanic Male, 45-49 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Hispanic Male, 45-49 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline A
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 3 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, December 2, 2025
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 3 days / Command Discipline A
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
NYPD Plea Agreement
additional details
Complaint #202202749, April 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 25-29 Unable to Determine
Discourtesy: Word Hispanic Female, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details
Complaint #202201577, March 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Male, 30-34 Complaint Withdrawn
additional details
Complaint #202008000, December 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Male, 30-34 Unsubstantiated
Force: Physical force Black Male, 30-34 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Male, 30-34 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Black Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #202005618, July 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 45-49 Unsubstantiated
Force: Physical force Black Male, 45-49 Unsubstantiated
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 45-49 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #202003500, May 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 25-29 Exonerated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2023-28995
Closed: 9/13/2023
Case Details:
  1. Wrongfully discourteous to an individual known to the Department.
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A

Case: 2022-25746
Closed: 2/26/2023
Case Details:
  1. Violated patrol rules.
Recommendation: Command Discipline - B


Lawsuits

Named in 7 known lawsuits, $165,000 total settlements.

Gonzalez, Cristy et Al vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 25CV05244, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, February 3, 2026

Gomez, Hector vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 816035/2025E, Supreme Court - Bronx, July 30, 2025, ended May 22, 2026
$45,000 Settlement

Galloway, Elijah, et al. vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 813531/2024E, Supreme Court - Bronx, August 27, 2024
Complaint
Description: On April 26, 2024 Plaintiff was lawfully in the vicinity of an intersection when PO Anthony Alvino, PO Mike Suarez, PO Jayther Liriano, PO John Doe, and PO John Roe approached Plaintiff in part based on his race and summarily assaulted, battered, searched, and arrested him in an aggressive manner. Plaintiff was wrongfully incarcerated for over 24 hours and was maliciously prosecuted, compelling Plaintiff to make multiple court appearances over an extended period of time until all charges were ultimately terminated. Plaintiff suffered physical and emotional pain and injuries as a result of this incident.

Huggin, Johnny vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 810499/2023E, Supreme Court - Bronx, July 11, 2023, ended August 7, 2024
$20,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On February 16, 2023, at approximately 10:00 p.m., PO LIRIANO, WECK, DOE and ROE without probable cause and/or justification, arrested the plaintiff in the vicinity of Morris Avenue and Park Avenue, Bronx, New York, where Plaintiff was lawfully and doing nothing illegal, improper or acting suspicious in anyway. Despite the absence of any evidence of wrongdoing by the Plaintiff, Plaintiff was grabbed, handcuffed, seized, and arrested in an excessive manner and force by the PO defendants and was transported to a local precinct. While Plaintiff was in the custody of the defendants, PO defendants intentionally touched, pushed, assaulted, battered, violated, searched, humiliated, photographed and handcuffed Plaintif...

Knight, Tahje vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 810019/2023E, Supreme Court - Bronx, June 29, 2023
Complaint
Description: For years, NYPD officers of the 40th Precinct and Public Service Area unlawfully targeted Plaintiff and attempted to prosecute Plaintiff without probable cause. On, March 12, 2021, plaintiff Tahje Knight was lawfully in the vicinity of East 125th Street in the Bronx when he was unlawfully approached, frisked, arrested and detained by defendant officers James Weck, Eric Dym, Michael Visintin, Jayther Liriano, Michael Kontorovich, Jose Tejada, and Nestor Amarantepolanco. When defendant officers stopped and frisked plaintiff and obtained no contraband, instead of releasing plaintiff, plaintiff was cuffed and detained to search for evidence of a crime. Plaintiff was then falsely charged by defendant officer We...

Martinez, Reynaldo, et al. vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 806015/2023E, Supreme Court - Bronx, April 18, 2023
Complaint
Description: On or about February 11, 2022, plaintiff Reyon Sylvester was lawfully in front or near an avenue in Brooklyn, when he was assaulted, battered and detained by unidentified police officers. After being detained for hours, plaintiff was released without charges.

Daniels, Dante vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 808766/2022E, Supreme Court - Bronx, July 5, 2022, ended December 3, 2025
$100,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On August 13, 2021, at approximately 11:30 p.m., the plaintiff, was lawfully in the vicinity of the Forest Housing Project, when defendant PO Miglaccio, Amarantepolanco and Liriano and others were conducting an arrest of a person by the name of "Shawn" where many of the individuals present at the location were objecting to the excessive use of force by the defendants on Shawn , which resulted in the use of pepper spray/mace on a number of individuals present. The defendant officers violently grabbed the plaintiff, threw him to the ground and jumped on him by several defendants. The officers then struck plaintiff in the head, body and limbs, causing injury. Officers placed their knees on the plaintiff's body a...

Other Documents