Robert Weinberg

Badge #30593, White Male
Former Police Officer at 44th Precinct
Service started January 2018, ended June 2020, Tax #965614

Substantiated Allegations:
Discourtesy: Word (2)

Lawsuit Settlements:
$25,000   Deckard, Ramel vs City of New York, et al., 2020 BCSC BCSC 021205/2020E
View Details

Complaints

1 Complaint
4 Allegations
2 Substantiated
2 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
2 Exonerated

Complaint #201904816, June 2019
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Penalty: Resigned
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201904816, June 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 21-24 Exonerated
Discourtesy: Word Exonerated
Discourtesy: Word Hispanic Male, 21-24 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Discourtesy: Word Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Penalty: Resigned
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.

Further details on conclusions.


Lawsuits

Deckard, Ramel vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 021205/2020E, Supreme Court - Bronx, January 31, 2020, ended August 16, 2022
$25,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On March 11, 2019 at 2:15 P.M., Plaintiff Ramel Deckard, was in the vicinity of East 168 Street and Grand Concourse, Bronx, NY. Defendants, including Robert Weinberg, Sergio De La Mota and John or Jane Doe 1-10 illegally searched the Plaintiff and falsely arrested the Plaintiff for possession of marijuana. Plaintiff had not committed any crime or violation of law. Defendants used excessive force while arresting the plaintiff and battered the plaintiff including placing him under tight handcuffs. Plaintiff was transported to the 44th precinct where he was illegally searched, including a strip-search with cavity inspection, questioned, photographed and fingerprinted by the Defendants. Defendants Weinberg and De ...

Other Documents