Conclusion Meanings:
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Named in 3 known lawsuits, $50,000 total settlements.
Staple, Errol vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 825932/2025E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, December 16, 2025
Sanchez, Miguel & Ramos, Jason vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 819025/2025E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, September 9, 2025
Aybar, Anthony vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 801147/2023E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, January 20, 2023, ended May 30, 2023
$50,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On October 16, 2022, plaintiff Anthony Aybar was doing nothing illegal, improper, or acting suspicious in any way when Police Officer John Achnitz, Lieutenant Franklin Bonilla, and other officers, absent any arrest warrant, probable or reasonable cause, or any legal justification, and based on fraud, perjury, and misrepresentations, approached Aybar with reckless, negligent, and callous disregard for the truth, and summarily stopped, questioned, searched, touched, grabbed, assaulted, battered, handcuffed, and detained Aybar in an aggressive, unlawful, and excessive manner. Achnitz, Bonilla, and other officers, knew or had reason to know that their actions lacked any legal justification in approaching, searching...