Gerald L. Mortimor

Badge #25946, Black Male
Police Officer at 102nd Precinct since March 2019
Service started July 2013, made $143,000 last year, Tax #955224

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera

Lawsuit Settlements:
$5,000   Martinez, Silvio, et al. vs City of New York, et al., 2017 SDNY SDNY 17CV01983
View Details

Complaints

3 Complaints
9 Allegations
3 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
2 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
2 Alleged Victim Unavailable
1 SRAD Closure
2 Unfounded
1 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202600677, January 2026
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Alleged Victim Unavailable
Allegation: Force: Hit against inanimate object
Complainant: Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Alleged Victim Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #202410307, October 2024
Allegation: Discourtesy: Action
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: SRAD Closure
additional details

Complaint #202303638, April 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Complainant: Male, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: Indian Male, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Indian Male, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Indian Male, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Male, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Indian Male, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #202600677, January 2026
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Male, 40-44 Alleged Victim Unavailable
Force: Hit against inanimate object Male, 40-44 Alleged Victim Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #202410307, October 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Action Hispanic Female, 35-39 SRAD Closure
additional details
Complaint #202303638, April 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Male, 50-54 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Indian Male, 50-54 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Indian Male, 50-54 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Indian Male, 50-54 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Male, 50-54 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Indian Male, 50-54 Within NYPD Guidelines
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'SRAD Closure': Strategic Resource Allocation Determination - due to citywide budget cuts, CCRB is no longer able to fully investigate certain cases within its jurisdiction and suspended investigating some types of complaints.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Lawsuits

Martinez, Silvio, et al. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 17CV01983, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, May 17, 2017, ended January 2, 2018
$5,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On February 21, 2015, plaintiffs were standing on a street corner when defendants approached, grabbed, punched and threw plaintiffs to the ground. Defendants then tightly handcuffed plaintiffs. Plaintiffs were transported to a nearby police precinct and released 5 hours later. All charges brought against plaintiffs were ultimately dismissed.