Alexandru B. Craivan

Badge #342, White Male
Detective Grade 3 at 113th Precinct Detective Squad since January 2019, active
Also served at Police Service Area 2
Service started January 2008, Tax #945624
Other names: Alexandr B. Craivan

Complaints

3 Complaints
4 Allegations
0 Substantiated
1 Exonerated
3 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202307296, April 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202307477, April 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #200905888, April 2009
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 16
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #202307296, April 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property Black Male, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202307477, April 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Male, 30-34 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises Male, 30-34 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #200905888, April 2009
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Hispanic Male, 16 Exonerated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Lawsuits

Best, Hilary A. vs Detective Alexandr Craivan, et al.
Case # 22CV04882, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, November 14, 2022
Complaint
Description: On March 16, 2020, Plaintiff received a phone call from Alexander Craivan claiming that a complaint had been made against Plaintiff for harassment. Plaintiff advised that Craivan obtain a sworn complaint and suspected a false claim. Craivan subjected Plaintiff to an I-CARD arrest, by which the Plaintiff was both arrested and detained without necessity of a sworn affidavit or deposition.