Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Samantha A. Medina
Badge #11693,
Hispanic Female
Police Officer at 90th Precinct since February 2025
Service
started January 2016,
made $59,200 last year,
Tax #960924
Complaints
2
Complaints
3
Allegations
1
Substantiated
1
Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
2
Unsubstantiated
Complaint #202102384,
January 2021
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 40-44 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unsubstantiated |
Complaint #202008322,
December 2020
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 35-39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unsubstantiated |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 35-39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Complaint #202102384, January 2021 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search | Black Male, 40-44 | Unsubstantiated |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202008322, December 2020 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search | Black Male, 35-39 | Unsubstantiated |
| Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card | Black Male, 35-39 | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusions.
Discipline
Case Details:
- Guilty: Failed to safeguard firearm.
- Guilty: Left the scene of an accident.
- Guilty: Operated a motor vehicle while ability impaired.
- Guilty: Operated a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant.
- Guilty: Refused to submit to a breathalyzer.
- Guilty: Unfit for duty while armed.
- Guilty: Unfit for duty.
Penalty: Counseling, dismissal probation (12 months), ordered breath testing, pre-trial suspension days (31 days), suspended w/o pay (19 days), vacation days (25 days)
Case Details:
- Violated patrol rules.
Penalty: A - Command Discipline
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A
Case Details:
- Failed to activate their body worn camera.
- Failed to make required entries in Department logs.
Penalty: Training
Recommendation: Other
Lawsuits
Abi-Saab, Ramzy vs City of New York, et Al .Case # 702611/2020, Supreme Court - Queens, July 7, 2020, ended May 14, 2021
Zero Disposition