Christopher A. Ierardi

Badge #14555, White Male
Police Officer at Firearms and Tactics Section since October 2014, active
Also served at 78th Precinct
Service started July 2006, made $114,000 last year, Tax #941924

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Question
Discourtesy: Word
Offensive Language: Ethnicity


Complaints

2 Complaints
4 Allegations
3 Substantiated
3 Substantiated (Charges)
1 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #201211620, September 2012
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question
Complainant: Male, 51
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Offensive Language: Ethnicity
Complainant: Male, 51
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Male, 51
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 5 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, January 2015
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 5 days
additional details

Complaint #201208281, June 2012
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 43
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #201211620, September 2012
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Question Male, 51 Substantiated (Charges)
Offensive Language: Ethnicity Male, 51 Substantiated (Charges)
Discourtesy: Word Male, 51 Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 5 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, January 2015
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 5 days
additional details
Complaint #201208281, June 2012
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment Hispanic Female, 43 Unsubstantiated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2014-11401
Document
Opened: 2/27/2014
Closed: 8/11/2014
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: While on-duty, was disrespectful in that he questioned a person known to the Department, without police necessity
  2. Guilty: While on-duty, used offensive language regarding a person known to the Department's ethnicity.
  3. Guilty: While on-duty, was discourteous to a person known to the Department.
Penalty: Vacation days (5 days)


Lawsuits

Sullivan v. City of New York et al
Case # 16CV02514, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY
Complaint
Description: Plaintiff was arrested outside of his estranged-wife's home by Defendant officers pursuant to a DV complaint. Plaintiff was charged with Aggravated Harassment and Harassment in the second degree, which were later dismissed.