Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises
Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises
Keith T. Hum
Lieutenant Special Assignment at Emergency Services Unit since April 2016
Service
started July 2004,
made $283,000 last year,
Tax #935034
Asian Male
Complaints
5
Complaints
9
Allegations
1
Substantiated
1
Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
3
Exonerated
2
Miscellaneous
1
Unable to Determine
2
Within NYPD Guidelines
Complaint #202312026,
December 2023
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Property damaged |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Male, 35-39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Miscellaneous |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Miscellaneous |
Complaint #202303445,
April 2023
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises |
|---|---|
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Documents: | Complaint Closing Report |
Complaint #202102378,
March 2021
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | White Female, 35-39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Exonerated |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises |
| Complainant: | White Female, 35-39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Exonerated |
Complaint #202102404,
February 2021
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises |
|---|---|
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
Complaint #201810238,
November 2018
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises |
|---|---|
| CCRB Conclusion: | Exonerated |
| Documents: | Complaint Closing Report |
| Complaint #202312026, December 2023 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Property damaged | Male, 35-39 | Unable to Determine |
| Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises | Miscellaneous | |
| Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises | Miscellaneous | |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202303445, April 2023 | ||
| Allegation | CCRB Conclusion | |
| Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises | Within NYPD Guidelines | |
| Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises | Within NYPD Guidelines | |
| Documents: | Complaint Closing Report | |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202102378, March 2021 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises | White Female, 35-39 | Exonerated |
| Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises | White Female, 35-39 | Exonerated |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202102404, February 2021 | ||
| Allegation | CCRB Conclusion | |
| Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) | |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #201810238, November 2018 | ||
| Allegation | CCRB Conclusion | |
| Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises | Exonerated | |
| Documents: | Complaint Closing Report | |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Discipline
Case: 2022-26478
Closed: 5/2/2024
Case Details:
- Wrongful search of a premises.
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A
Lawsuits
Polonsky, Gennady vs Police Department, Nyc, et al.Case # 14CV02519, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, October 8, 2014, ended February 20, 2015
Settlement
Complaint
Description: On April 13, 2011, Plaintiff proceeded to take the subway after completing a shift at his work. While in the transfer tunnel, a man in civilian clothes approached him from behind on his left side, reached into his right-side pants pockets, removed a knife without cause or legal justification, and without identifying himself as a police officer, detained Plaintiff. He carried the knife with him every day to use it as a tool at his job. He purchased the knife from a catalogue, which did not market or describe the knife as a gravity knife. Defendant Fleischhauer arrested Plaintiff following his sergeant's order, although both the arrest and the order lacked cause or legal justification. Plaintiff was issued a su...