Jason P. Ribeiro

Badge #2918, Asian Male, 42
Detective Grade 3 at Warrant Section since November 2016
Also served at 71st Precinct
Service started July 2011, made $186,000 last year, Tax #951134

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises (2)
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises (2)

Lawsuit Settlements:
$25,000   Jackson, Allen vs City of New York, et al., 2015 EDNY EDNY 15CV00450
View Details

Complaints

6 Complaints
18 Allegations
5 Substantiated
2 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
2 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
3 Complainant Uncooperative
2 Exonerated
4 Unable to Determine
1 Unfounded
3 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #202200554, January 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to show arrest warrant
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202103594, June 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Complainant: Black Female, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises
Complainant: Black Female, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline A
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 5 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, June 8, 2026
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 5 days / Command Discipline A
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201710171, December 2017
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Allegation: Force: Gun Pointed
Complainant: Black Male, 21
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property
Complainant: Black Female, 22
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
Complainant: Black Female, 19
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Penalty: Formalized Training
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201503153, March 2015
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 34
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201501020, February 2015
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Black Male, 23
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201403389, April 2014
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 35
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202200554, January 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to show arrest warrant Hispanic Female, 25-29 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Hispanic Female, 25-29 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Hispanic Female, 25-29 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Hispanic Female, 25-29 Unable to Determine
Force: Physical force Hispanic Female, 25-29 Unable to Determine
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #202103594, June 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Black Female, 45-49 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises Black Female, 45-49 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Black Male, 35-39 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Male, 35-39 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Male, 35-39 Unsubstantiated
NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline A
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 5 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, June 8, 2026
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 5 days / Command Discipline A
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201710171, December 2017
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Force: Gun Pointed Black Male, 21 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property Black Female, 22 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Black Female, 19 Unsubstantiated
Penalty: Formalized Training
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201503153, March 2015
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 34 Complainant Uncooperative
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201501020, February 2015
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Black Male, 23 Complainant Uncooperative
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201403389, April 2014
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 35 Complainant Uncooperative
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusions.


Lawsuits

Named in 2 known lawsuits, $25,000 total settlements.

Francillon, Benshley vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 516469/2026, Supreme Court - Kings, May 5, 2026

Jackson, Allen vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 15CV00450, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, February 19, 2015, ended October 13, 2015
$25,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: Plaintiff observed arrest of his friend inside apartment building. Defendant Officers entered Plaintiff's apartment without permission and arrested Plaintiff. Defendant Officer dragged plaintiff down two flights of stairs while Plaintiff was handcuffed. Plaintiff was taken to the 71st precinct and released without charge after three hours.

Other Documents

Employment History Summary