Martha Lequerica

Badge #4572, Hispanic Female
Former Sergeant at 104th Precinct
Also served at Transit Bureau District 1
Service started February 1994, ended December 2019, Tax #906634


Lawsuit settlements:
$475,000   Sakevich, John vs City of New York, et al., 2013 SDNY SDNY 13CV07165
View Details

Complaints

3 Complaints
5 Allegations
0 Substantiated
2 Exonerated
1 Unfounded
2 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #201807181, August 2018
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: White Male, 49
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: White Female, 46
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200803212, March 2008
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question
Complainant: Female, 14
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Offensive Language: Race
Complainant: Black Female, 55
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #200602975, February 2006
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 22
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #201807181, August 2018
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest White Male, 49 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest White Female, 46 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #200803212, March 2008
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Question Female, 14 Exonerated
Offensive Language: Race Black Female, 55 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #200602975, February 2006
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop Hispanic Female, 22 Exonerated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2013-9190
Opened: 6/20/2013
Closed: 12/19/2014
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: Made disparaging remarks to a member of the service regarding ethnicity
  2. Guilty: Touched another member of the service's private parts with an open hand
  3. Guilty: Touched another member of the service's leg while commenting on it
  4. Guilty: Touched and/or stroked another member of the service's hair without permission
  5. Guilty In Part: Failed to obey a lawful order from a supervising officer
  6. Guilty: Attempted to prevent another member of the service from exiting a room
Penalty: Forfeiture of twenty-five (25) vacation days


Lawsuits

Sakevich, John vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 13CV07165, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, October 11, 2013, ended March 7, 2016
$475,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On July 10, 2012, Officer Martha Lequerica and a sergeant stopped plaintiff's vehicle without just cause. Officer Lequerica ordered plaintiff out of the car and searched, handcuffed, and arrested him without probable cause. Officers Luis Martinez and Robert Veloz were present. Officers Teres Nivar, Jose Morales, and Nilka Vargas then arrived at the location. Officer Lequerica intentionally tightened plaintiff's right handcuff, resulting in pain. Plaintiff asked for it to be loosened, and his request was ignored. Plaintiff was placed in a van with Officers Novar, Morales, and an unknown officer. He repeatedly asked them to loosen his handcuff or provide him with medical care and was ignored. He was taken to a pr...

Other Documents

NYPD Trial Decision 12/19/2014