Kieran P. Ross

Kieran P. Ross

Kieran P. Ross
Badge #2868, White Male
Police Officer at Warrant Section since April 2026
Also served at 83rd Precinct
Service started January 2019, made $148,000 last year, Tax #967310

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Abuse of Authority: Question
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Abuse of Authority: Stop
Discourtesy: Word (3)

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2023-27737
Closed: 2/6/2023

View Details

Lawsuit Settlements:
$50,000   Howard, Joseph vs City of Ny, et al., 2023 EDNY EDNY 23CV02351
$23,500   Ortiz, Eric vs City of Ny, et al., 2023 EDNY EDNY 23CV01164
View Details

Complaints

6 Complaints
20 Allegations
7 Substantiated
7 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
2 Closed - Pending Litigation
7 Unable to Determine
1 Unfounded
3 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202412810, December 2024
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202408926, September 2024
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - A
Penalty: Command Discipline - A (Warned and Admonished) / Instructions
additional details

Complaint #202306482, June 2023
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #202301642, February 2023
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202301198, February 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question
Complainant: Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline A
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 5 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, April 9, 2026
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 5 days / Command Discipline A
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202206679, October 2022
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #202412810, December 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Black Male, 40-44 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202408926, September 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 35-39 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Other Male, 35-39 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Question Black Male, 35-39 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - A
Penalty: Command Discipline - A (Warned and Admonished) / Instructions
additional details
Complaint #202306482, June 2023
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Within NYPD Guidelines
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details
Complaint #202301642, February 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #202301198, February 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Male, 18-20 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Question Male, 18-20 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Male, 18-20 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Question Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Question Black Male, 21-24 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Black Male, 21-24 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Unable to Determine
Force: Physical force Male, 18-20 Unfounded
Discourtesy: Word Male, 18-20 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Male, 18-20 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Male, 18-20 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline A
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 5 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, April 9, 2026
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 5 days / Command Discipline A
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #202206679, October 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 25-29 Closed - Pending Litigation
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 25-29 Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2023-27737
Closed: 2/6/2023
Case Details:
  1. Pleaded Guilty: Failed to activate their body-worn camera.
  2. Pleaded Guilty: Wrongfully deactivated their body-worn camera.
Penalty: Vacation days (20 days)


Lawsuits

Named in 6 known lawsuits, $73,500 total settlements.

Short, Derrick vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 516775/2025, Supreme Court - Kings, September 11, 2025

Hernandez, Tommy Francesco vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 513369/2025, Supreme Court - Kings, April 29, 2025

Prentiss, Jasheem vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 24CV03778, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, August 15, 2024
Complaint
Description: On February 26, 2023, plaintiff was walking down the sidewalk in Brooklyn when he was appraoched by defendant NYPD officers Kieran Ross, Matthew Arvelo, and Matthew Varela. The defendants stopped plaintiff without probable cause or reasonable suspicion, forced him to the ground, knelt on him, and unlawfully searched his person. He suffered injuries to his shoulder, leg, and hand. He was then arrested and taken to a nearby police precinct, where he was held for four hours before being released with summonses. The summonses were based on false reports that defendant Ross submitted to the Kings County DA's office. When plaintiff appeared to respond to these summonses, all charges were dismissed and the records we...

Robles, Johnathan vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 527154/2023, Supreme Court - Kings, September 26, 2023
Complaint
Description: On September 3, 2022, the plaintiff was lawfully in the vicinity of Stanhope Street and Knickerbocker Avenue in Kings County, New York, when the defendant officers unlawfully approached, questioned, searched, and arrested him without probable cause or legal justification, using excessive force. The defendant officers assaulted and battered the plaintiff, applying unreasonably tight metal handcuffs. Following the arrest, the plaintiff was transported to the 83rd Precinct against his will. He was subsequently arraigned in Kings County Criminal Court and charged with baseless crimes. The plaintiff endured approximately three days of unlawful custody at the NYPD 83rd Precinct and Kings County Central Bookings. All ...

Howard, Joseph vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 23CV02351, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, April 6, 2023, ended September 3, 2024
$50,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On November 11, 2022, the Plaintiff was wrongfully arrested by the PO for participating in a gang assault and attempted robery. The PO claimed to have seen the Plaintiff in a video recording. The Plaintiff spent 5 days in custody, thereafter the Plaintiff was released by the DA for not finding any evidence.

Ortiz, Eric vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 23CV01164, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, February 28, 2023, ended August 3, 2024
$23,500 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On June 12, 2022, the Plaintiff was viciously assaulted and suffered a broken nose. Upon reporting the incident at the police station, the Plaintiff was instead wrongfully arrested and detained based on a 30+ year old previously vacated warrant for the arrest of a completely different person. The Plaintiff informed the PO's that he was incarcerated in a federal prison from April 2006 until December 2016 and could not have a warrant for his arrest. The Plaintiff was physically restrained and detained for three days and denied medical treatment. The corrections officer also denied medical treatment and denied access to a bed for three days. Thereafter, upon being produced before the judge, the Plaintiff was relea...

Other Documents

NYPD Trial Decision 11/10/2023