Ralphie Brooks
Badge #2433,
Black Male
Service
started January 2005,
made $152,000 last year,
Tax #936244
Lawsuit settlements:
$10,000 Stokes, Salim vs City of New York, et al., 2016 EDNY EDNY 16CV00413
View Details
$10,000 Stokes, Salim vs City of New York, et al., 2016 EDNY EDNY 16CV00413
View Details
Complaints
6
Complaints
11
Allegations
0
Substantiated
3
Complainant Uncooperative
2
Exonerated
2
Unable to Determine
2
Unsubstantiated
2
Within NYPD Guidelines
Complaint #202303448,
December 2022
additional details
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | White Male, 18-20 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises |
| Complainant: | Male, 18-20 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
| Complainant: | White Male, 18-20 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
Complaint #201703344,
April 2017
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Strip-searched |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Complainant Uncooperative |
Complaint #201700849,
January 2017
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 37 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Exonerated |
| Allegation: | Force: Chokehold |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 37 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unsubstantiated |
Complaint #201700926,
June 2016
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 33 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unsubstantiated |
Complaint #201101629,
February 2011
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Hispanic Male, 41 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Exonerated |
Complaint #200913377,
August 2009
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 27 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Complainant Uncooperative |
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 27 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Complainant Uncooperative |
| Complaint #202303448, December 2022 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Discourtesy: Word | White Male, 18-20 | Unable to Determine |
| Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises | Male, 18-20 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Force: Physical force | White Male, 18-20 | Unable to Determine |
| Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises | Within NYPD Guidelines | |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #201703344, April 2017 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Strip-searched | Black Male, 34 | Complainant Uncooperative |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #201700849, January 2017 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Black Male, 37 | Exonerated |
| Force: Chokehold | Black Male, 37 | Unsubstantiated |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #201700926, June 2016 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Black Male, 33 | Unsubstantiated |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #201101629, February 2011 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Hispanic Male, 41 | Exonerated |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #200913377, August 2009 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) | Black Male, 27 | Complainant Uncooperative |
| Force: Physical force | Black Male, 27 | Complainant Uncooperative |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Discipline
Case: 2010-2268
Closed: 3/11/2011
Case Details:
- Guilty: While on-duty, did abuse his authority as a member of the New York City Police Department by wrongfully issuing a summons to an individual known to the Department without sufficient legal authority.
- Guilty: While on-duty, failed to prepare required reports.
Penalty: Instructions, vacation days (20 days)
Lawsuits
Stokes, Salim vs City of New York, et al.Case # 16CV00413, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, February 4, 2016, ended January 19, 2017
$10,000 Settlement
Complaint, Amended Complaint
Description: Plaintiff was exiting a building when Defendant Officers stopped him, asked him for ID, arrested him, and charged him with 140.10, 140.05, and 140.15, which were ACD'd. The same incident occurred on January 15,2015 and again on May 19, 2015.