Michael T. Cohen

Badge #2311, White Male
Detective Grade 3 at Narcotics Borough Bronx North Major Case Unit since May 2026
Also served at Real Time Crime Center, 100th Precinct, Narcotics Borough Bronx
Service started July 2007, made $184,000 last year, Tax #944444

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Abuse of Authority: Property damaged
Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises

Complaints

2 Complaints
6 Allegations
4 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
3 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
1 Alleged Victim Unavailable
1 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202404094, April 2024
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Property damaged
Complainant: Female, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to show arrest warrant
Complainant: Female, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Female, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Complainant: Female, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises
Complainant: Female, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details

Complaint #201109024, June 2011
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 24
CCRB Conclusion: Alleged Victim Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #202404094, April 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Property damaged Female, 40-44 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to show arrest warrant Female, 40-44 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Female, 40-44 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Female, 40-44 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises Female, 40-44 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details
Complaint #201109024, June 2011
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 24 Alleged Victim Unavailable
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Lawsuits

Washington, Khalif, et al. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 702137/2013, Supreme Court - Queens, June 11, 2013, ended January 19, 2018
Administrative Closing
Complaint
Description: On or about March 16, 2012, plaintiffs were traveling in a taxi to Stella Maris High School in Queens, New York, to watch a basketball game when defendant NYPD officers suddenly pulled over the taxi without cause or reason. After pulling over the taxi, the defendant officers directed the plaintiffs to exit the vehicle. The plaintiffs were then subject to an illegal search with the defendants harassing and threatening harm to them. Nothing was recovered from the searches, but the defendants nonetheless arrested the plaintiffs and transported them to the 100th Precinct. The defendants falsely stated to prosecutors that the plaintiffs were in possession of a weapon. About a week later the false charges were summar...