Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Keron K. Edwards
Badge #3553,
Black Male
Sergeant at Police Service Area 9 since July 2026
Service
started July 2015,
made $161,000 last year,
Tax #958544
Lawsuit Settlements:
$22,500 Baker, Michael vs City of New York, et al., 2020 KCSC KCSC 507542/2020
View Details
$22,500 Baker, Michael vs City of New York, et al., 2020 KCSC KCSC 507542/2020
View Details
Complaints
4
Complaints
7
Allegations
1
Substantiated
1
Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
4
Complainant Uncooperative
1
Unable to Determine
1
Unfounded
Complaint #202506698,
July 2025
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Age 25-29 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Complainant Uncooperative |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name |
| Complainant: | Age 25-29 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Complainant Uncooperative |
Complaint #202500499,
January 2025
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Complainant Uncooperative |
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Complainant Uncooperative |
Complaint #202303724,
April 2023
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Male, 21-24 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Action |
| Complainant: | Male, 21-24 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| NYPD Conclusion: | No Disciplinary Action-DUP |
| Penalty: | No penalty |
Complaint #202000948,
January 2020
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Documents: | Complaint Closing Report |
| Complaint #202506698, July 2025 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number | Age 25-29 | Complainant Uncooperative |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name | Age 25-29 | Complainant Uncooperative |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202500499, January 2025 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Black Male, 30-34 | Complainant Uncooperative |
| Discourtesy: Word | Black Male, 30-34 | Complainant Uncooperative |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202303724, April 2023 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera | Male, 21-24 | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Discourtesy: Action | Male, 21-24 | Unable to Determine |
| NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP | ||
| Penalty: No penalty | ||
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202000948, January 2020 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card | Male, 30-34 | Unfounded |
| Documents: | Complaint Closing Report | |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
Further details on conclusions.
Lawsuits
Baker, Michael vs City of New York, et al.Case # 507542/2020, Supreme Court - Kings, May 28, 2020, ended June 22, 2021
$22,500 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On October 19, 2019, Plaintiff was lawfully present in the vicinity of his grandmother’s apartment building, when he was subjected to an unlawful stop and search by Defendant Officer Edwards and Officers John Does 1-10. Defendant Officers pushed Plaintiff against the wall and put a forearm into Plaintiff’s head, causing physical injury. Defendant Officers unlawfully handcuffed Plaintiff without probable cause. Plaintiff was then searched by Defendant Officers, and no contraband was found. Plaintiff was transported to and unlawfully imprisoned at the 79th Precinct. The excessively tight handcuffs caused pain and physical injury to both of Plaintiff’s wrists. Defendant Officers refused to tell Plaintiff the reaso...