Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Matthew M. Divito
Deputy Inspector at Transit Bureau District 2 since March 2025
Service
started July 2008,
made $193,000 last year,
Tax #946944
White Male
Complaints
2
Complaints
4
Allegations
1
Substantiated
1
Substantiated (Formalized Training)
1
Unfounded
2
Within NYPD Guidelines
Complaint #202409578,
June 2024
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Nonlethal restraining device |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Male, 55-59 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) |
| Complainant: | Male, 55-59 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera |
| Complainant: | Male, 55-59 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Formalized Training) |
| Penalty: | Formalized Training |
Complaint #202403624,
April 2024
additional details
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 35-39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Complaint #202409578, June 2024 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Nonlethal restraining device | Male, 55-59 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) | Male, 55-59 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera | Male, 55-59 | Substantiated (Formalized Training) |
| Penalty: Formalized Training | ||
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202403624, April 2024 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Discourtesy: Word | Black Male, 35-39 | Unfounded |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Discipline
Case: 2015-14601
Closed: 7/6/2016
Case Details:
- Guilty: While off-duty and out of state, impeded an investigation into the whereabouts of another Member of Service.
- Guilty: While off-duty, failed to make himself available to the duty Captain, upon learning that the duty Captain was responding.
- Guilty: While off-duty, failed to notify the operations division upon becoming involved in a unusual police occurrence to which he was a participant or a witness.
Penalty: Vacation days (15 days)