Germaine O. Peart

Germaine O. Peart

Germaine O. Peart
Badge #20019, Black Male
Police Officer at 49th Precinct since December 2015, active
Service started July 2015, made $119,000 last year, Tax #959054

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Discourtesy: Word

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2023-29559
Closed: 2/6/2024
Case: 2023-29100
Closed: 10/9/2023

View Details

Complaints

2 Complaints
4 Allegations
2 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
1 Unfounded
1 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202204110, June 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Complainant: American Indian Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: American Indian Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: American Indian Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #202203407, May 2022
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: Previously Adjudicated
Penalty: Closed Administratively (Instructions)
additional details

Complaint #202204110, June 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises American Indian Male, 40-44 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card American Indian Male, 40-44 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number American Indian Male, 40-44 Unfounded
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details
Complaint #202203407, May 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Male, 35-39 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: Previously Adjudicated
Penalty: Closed Administratively (Instructions)
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2023-29559
Closed: 2/6/2024
Case Details:
  1. Violated patrol rules.
Recommendation: Training

Case: 2023-29100
Closed: 10/9/2023
Case Details:
  1. Wrongfully discourteous to an individual known to the Department.
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A