Eric I. Stoll

Eric I. Stoll

Eric I. Stoll
Badge #30364, White Male, 39
Police Officer at 67th Precinct since December 2023, active
Service started January 2013, made $118,000 last year, Tax #954354

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Obstructed Shield Number
Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2022-25755
Closed: 5/20/2022

View Details

Complaints

4 Complaints
7 Allegations
2 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Exonerated
2 OMB PEG Directive Closure
1 Unfounded
1 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #202403672, April 2024
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property
Complainant: Black Female, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: OMB PEG Directive Closure
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Black Female, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: OMB PEG Directive Closure
additional details

Complaint #202008169, November 2020
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Female, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat re: removal to hospital
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Obstructed Shield Number
Complainant: Black Female, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #202004616, June 2020
Allegation: Offensive Language: Other
Complainant: Black Female, 65-69
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #201605977, July 2016
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Penalty: Formalized Training
additional details

Complaint #202403672, April 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property Black Female, 40-44 OMB PEG Directive Closure
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Black Female, 40-44 OMB PEG Directive Closure
additional details
Complaint #202008169, November 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Black Female, 40-44 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Threat re: removal to hospital Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Obstructed Shield Number Black Female, 40-44 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details
Complaint #202004616, June 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Offensive Language: Other Black Female, 65-69 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #201605977, July 2016
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Penalty: Formalized Training
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'OMB PEG Directive Closure': Due to citywide budget cuts, CCRB is no longer able to fully investigate certain cases within its jurisdiction and suspended investigating some types of complaints.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2022-25755
Closed: 5/20/2022
Case Details:
  1. Violated uniform rules.
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A


Lawsuits

Hunte, Hugh vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 529923/2022, Supreme Court - Kings, November 22, 2022

Other Documents