Fabio I. Checo

Badge #621, Hispanic Male

Detective Grade 3 at 40th Precinct Detective Squad since May 2017, active

Also served at 40th Precinct

Service started July 2003, made $163,000 last year, Tax #932454

Credibility:
'Fabio Checo' appears on the 'Adverse Credibility' list of officers with potential credibility problems.

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2011-6538

Closed: 10/10/2014

Document

View Details

Articles

A Union Scandal Landed Hundreds of NYPD Officers on a Secret Watchlist. That Hasn’t Stopped Some From Jeopardizing Cases, ProPublica, 10/22/2021

Complaints

6 Allegations

0 Substantiated

1 Complaint

2 Exonerated

1 Unfounded

3 Unsubstantiated

June 2015 Complaint

Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
Complainant:	Male, 24
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant:	Male, 24
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
Complainant:	Male, 24
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Allegation:	Force: Gun Pointed
Complainant:	Male, 24
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant:	Male, 24
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
Complainant:	Male, 24
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated

additional details

June 2015 Complaint
Allegation	Complainant	CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number	Male, 24	Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)	Male, 24	Unsubstantiated
Force: Physical force	Male, 24	Unfounded
Force: Gun Pointed	Male, 24	Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Stop	Male, 24	Exonerated
Force: Physical force	Male, 24	Exonerated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.

Discipline

Case: 2011-6538

Document

Opened: 12/27/2011

Closed: 10/10/2014

Case Details:

Guilty: On one (1) occasion assisted and/or requested the assistance of other members of the service to prevent the processing and adjudication of two (2) summonses issued to various individuals

Penalty: Dismissal from the New York City Police Department; however, judgment is suspended and respondent will be placed on dismissal probation for a period of one (1) year. Forfeiture of five (5) days to be served on suspension and twenty-five (25) vacation days.

Lawsuits