Michael Tapia

Badge #12053, Hispanic Male
Former Police Officer at Detective Borough Bronx
Also served at 46th Precinct, 48th Precinct
Service started July 2005, ended February 2016, Tax #939554

Complaints

4 Complaints
7 Allegations
0 Substantiated
1 Complainant Uncooperative
3 Exonerated
1 Unfounded
2 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #201008649, June 2010
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 30
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #201005901, May 2010
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 23
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #200711628, August 2007
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 22
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Male, 22
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 22
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 22
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #200606104, April 2006
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: White Male, 41
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #201008649, June 2010
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 30 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #201005901, May 2010
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 23 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #200711628, August 2007
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 22 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Male, 22 Exonerated
Force: Physical force Black Male, 22 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 22 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #200606104, April 2006
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word White Male, 41 Unfounded
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Other Documents