Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusions.
Named in 5 known lawsuits, $30,000 total settlements.
Santiago, Gregory vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 302013/2015,
Supreme Court - Bronx, September 4, 2015, ended May 29, 2019
Zero Disposition
Shepherd, Zane vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 022088/2012,
Supreme Court - Bronx, September 14, 2012, ended March 24, 2015
$25,000 Settlement
Stipulation
Shepherd, Reginald vs City of New York
Case # 022090/2012,
Supreme Court - Bronx, September 14, 2012, ended March 24, 2015
$5,000 Settlement
Medina, Stephen Vilanueva vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 027626/2003,
Supreme Court - Bronx, December 9, 2003, ended February 4, 2013
Zero Disposition
Baez v. City of New York et al
Case # 305116/2012,
Supreme Court - Bronx
Summons/Complaint