Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusions.
Named in 2 known lawsuits, $200,000 total settlements.
Sharrock, Jonathan vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 24CV08873,
U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, January 16, 2025, ended June 1, 2026
$200,000 Settlement
Complaint
Charter, Alisia & Aurelus, Marc vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 001693/2016,
Supreme Court - Kings, February 22, 2016
Complaint
Description: On April 12, 2015, after Plaintiff was struck by a non-law-enforcement defendant's car at an intersection, police officers Stephen Andolina and Jaclyn Grasso, and police sargeants Rios, Michael Lindsley and John Does, falsely arrested and confined Plaintiff, causing further physical and emotional injuries.