Michael R. Kennedy

Badge #15826, White Male
Police Officer at 110th Precinct since May 2012
Service started July 2010, made $138,000 last year, Tax #949164

Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Physical force
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Discourtesy: Word (2)

Lawsuit Settlements:
$100,000   Kalam, Meher vs City of Ny, et al., 2022 QCSC QCSC 723811/2022
View Details

Complaints

5 Complaints
21 Allegations
6 Substantiated
2 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
2 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
2 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
5 Complainant Unavailable
1 OMB PEG Directive Closure
1 Unable to Determine
4 Unfounded
1 Unsubstantiated
3 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202409514, September 2024
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Complainant: Male, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Male, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property
Complainant: Male, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details

Complaint #202306102, May 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat re: removal to hospital
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: OMB PEG Directive Closure
additional details

Complaint #202304910, April 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Force: Restricted Breathing
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Force: Restricted Breathing
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #201606270, July 2016
Allegation: Force: Flashlight as club
Complainant: Black Male, 19
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #201507331, August 2015
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 21
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 21
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Property damaged
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 21
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
Allegation: Force: Hit against inanimate object
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 21
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 21
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #202409514, September 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Male, 50-54 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Male, 50-54 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property Male, 50-54 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Discourtesy: Word Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details
Complaint #202306102, May 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat re: removal to hospital Male, 35-39 OMB PEG Directive Closure
additional details
Complaint #202304910, April 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital Male, 35-39 Within NYPD Guidelines
Discourtesy: Word Male, 35-39 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Force: Physical force Male, 35-39 Within NYPD Guidelines
Force: Restricted Breathing Male, 35-39 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Male, 35-39 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Force: Physical force Male, 35-39 Unfounded
Force: Physical force Male, 35-39 Unfounded
Force: Restricted Breathing Male, 35-39 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Male, 35-39 Unfounded
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details
Complaint #201606270, July 2016
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Flashlight as club Black Male, 19 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #201507331, August 2015
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Hispanic Male, 21 Complainant Unavailable
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Hispanic Male, 21 Complainant Unavailable
Abuse of Authority: Property damaged Hispanic Male, 21 Complainant Unavailable
Force: Hit against inanimate object Hispanic Male, 21 Complainant Unavailable
Abuse of Authority: Other Hispanic Male, 21 Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'OMB PEG Directive Closure': Due to citywide budget cuts, CCRB is no longer able to fully investigate certain cases within its jurisdiction and suspended investigating some types of complaints.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Lawsuits

Kalam, Meher vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 723811/2022, Supreme Court - Queens, November 17, 2022, ended April 30, 2025
$100,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On May 15, 2022, Plaintiff was walking on the sidewalk near the corner of a street in Elmhurst in Queens, when an unknown male approached Plaintiff, attempted to mug him, stabbed him in the chest twice, then fled. Plaintiff called 911 and, Defendants, including Melissa MAY and Michael KENNEDY arrived. Several cameras showed the accidents and the following assault by the NYPD officers. While, Plaintiff was showing his wound to some officers and medical care, M. Kennedy pulled Plaintiff down to the ground and punched him in the face causing him a nose fracture. He was handcuffed and then transported to the hospital.