Gennaro Santerelli

Badge #22855, White Male
Former Police Officer at 77th Precinct
Service started February 1994, ended June 2008, Tax #907264

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Discourtesy: Word

Complaints

6 Complaints
14 Allegations
3 Substantiated
3 Substantiated (Charges)
2 Exonerated
1 Unfounded
8 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #200709025, May 2007
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 29
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Offensive Language: Race
Complainant: Black Male, 29
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200508249, July 2005
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Black Male, 36
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Black Male, 36
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Offensive Language: Race
Complainant: Black Male, 36
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200509219, March 2005
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Black Male, 64
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Action
Complainant: Black Male, 64
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200500498, January 2005
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop
Complainant: Black Male, 34
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Female, 33
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Offensive Language: Ethnicity
Complainant: Black Male, 34
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200400424, January 2004
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 26
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Black Male, 26
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
Complainant: Black Male, 26
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
additional details

Complaint #9900799, February 1999
Allegation: Force: Beat
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #200709025, May 2007
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 29 Unsubstantiated
Offensive Language: Race Black Male, 29 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #200508249, July 2005
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Black Male, 36 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Black Male, 36 Exonerated
Offensive Language: Race Black Male, 36 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #200509219, March 2005
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Black Male, 64 Exonerated
Discourtesy: Action Black Male, 64 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #200500498, January 2005
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop Black Male, 34 Unsubstantiated
Discourtesy: Word Black Female, 33 Unsubstantiated
Offensive Language: Ethnicity Black Male, 34 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #200400424, January 2004
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 26 Substantiated (Charges)
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Black Male, 26 Substantiated (Charges)
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Black Male, 26 Substantiated (Charges)
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
additional details
Complaint #9900799, February 1999
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Force: Beat Unfounded
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.