Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Eric C. Martinez
Badge #1563,
Hispanic Male
Police Officer at 47th Precinct since September 2021
Service
started July 2010,
made $184,000 last year,
Tax #949264
Articles
NYPD bosses allegedly put heat on injured cop to lie about fight with fellow officer, New York Daily News, 1/27/2018Complaints
6
Complaints
7
Allegations
1
Substantiated
1
Substantiated (Formalized Training)
1
Alleged Victim Unavailable
1
Exonerated
1
Unable to Determine
3
Unsubstantiated
Complaint #202304167,
May 2023
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera |
| Complainant: | Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Formalized Training) |
| Penalty: | Formalized Training |
Complaint #201408063,
August 2014
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton) |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 23 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Exonerated |
Complaint #201407676,
July 2014
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Hispanic Male, 21 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Alleged Victim Unavailable |
Complaint #201311893,
April 2013
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Hispanic Male, 21 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unsubstantiated |
Complaint #201200903,
January 2012
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 56 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unsubstantiated |
Complaint #201116084,
December 2011
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 31 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unsubstantiated |
| Complaint #202304167, May 2023 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Black Male, 30-34 | Unable to Determine |
| Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera | Male, 30-34 | Substantiated (Formalized Training) |
| Penalty: Formalized Training | ||
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #201408063, August 2014 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton) | Black Male, 23 | Exonerated |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #201407676, July 2014 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Hispanic Male, 21 | Alleged Victim Unavailable |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #201311893, April 2013 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Hispanic Male, 21 | Unsubstantiated |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #201200903, January 2012 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search | Black Male, 56 | Unsubstantiated |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #201116084, December 2011 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Black Male, 31 | Unsubstantiated |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusions.
Discipline
Case: 2016-15146
Closed: 1/26/2017
Case Details:
- Guilty: Having become aware of an allegation of misconduct by a member of the service, failed to report said allegation to the Internal Affairs Bureau.
- Guilty: While on-duty, failded and neglected to make activity log entries.
- Guilty: While on-duty, failed and neglected to safeguard his on-duty firearm.
- Guilty: While on-duty, failed to render reasonable aid to a sick or injured person.
- Guilty: While on-duty, was involved in a physical altercation with another Member of Service.
Penalty: Counseling, dismissal probation (12 months), ordered breath testing, pre-trial suspension days (33 days), suspended w/o pay (20 days), vacation days (35 days)
Case: 2016-15901
Closed: 8/1/2016
Case Details:
- Guilty: Consumed an intoxicant to the extent that said Police Officer was unfit for duty.
- Guilty: Failed to identity himself promptly to initial responding members of service.
- Guilty: Operated a motor vehicle while his ability was impaired by the consumption of an intoxicant.
- Guilty: Operated a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant and collided with another vehicle causing injuries to its passenger or operator.
- Guilty: Refused to submit to a chemical breath test to determine his blood alcohol concentration.
- Guilty: While off-duty, operated a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant.
Penalty: Counseling, dismissal probation (12 months), ordered breath testing, pre-trial suspension days (33 days), suspended w/o pay (20 days), vacation days (35 days)
Lawsuits
Named in 2 known lawsuits.Nicholas, Kadeem & Leandro, Viviana vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 805062/2026E, Supreme Court - Bronx, March 18, 2026
Alexandre, Donald, et al. vs P.O. Martinez, Eric C., et al.
Case # 152301/2016, Supreme Court - New York, March 24, 2016
Complaint
Description: On August 1, 2015, Plaintiff Alexandre was intentionally assaulted and battered by Police Officer Eric C. Martinez, causing Plaintiff to suffer and sustain severe and permanent personal injuries to his head, limbs, and body, and will continue to suffer great physical and mental pain and serious bodily injury and remain sick, sore, lame, and disabled. Plaintiff is informed and believes that he will permanently suffer from the effects of his injuries and suffer permanent embarrassment and continuous pain and inconvenience. Plaintiff Campbell was the wife of Plaintiff Alexandre and was entitled but to will be deprived of the support, services, society and consortium of Plaintiff Alexandre. Plaintiff Campbell has e...