Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Discourtesy: Word (2)
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Discourtesy: Word (2)
Howard Darsi
Badge #6624,
White Male
Police Officer at 75th Precinct since March 2021
Service
started October 2019,
made $90,200 last year,
Tax #968364
Discipline Cases:
Case: 2023-29494
Closed: 1/6/2024
Case: 2023-29501
Closed: 1/5/2024
Case: 2023-29501
Closed: 1/5/2024
View Details
Lawsuit Settlements:
$35,000 Collado, Stacey vs City of Ny, et al., 2022 QCSC QCSC 714469/2022
View Details
$35,000 Collado, Stacey vs City of Ny, et al., 2022 QCSC QCSC 714469/2022
View Details
Complaints
5
Complaints
12
Allegations
3
Substantiated
3
Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1
Closed - Pending Litigation
1
Unable to Determine
3
Unfounded
4
Within NYPD Guidelines
Complaint #202312059,
December 2023
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Female, 18-20 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
Complaint #202205747,
August 2022
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Age 40-44 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Closed - Pending Litigation |
Complaint #202204727,
July 2022
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Male, 40-44 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name |
| Complainant: | Male, 40-44 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest |
| Complainant: | Male, 40-44 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card |
| Complainant: | Male, 40-44 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| NYPD Conclusion: | No Disciplinary Action-DUP |
| Penalty: | No penalty |
Complaint #202205003,
July 2022
additional details
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Hispanic Male, 40-44 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| NYPD Conclusion: | No Disciplinary Action-DUP |
| Penalty: | No penalty |
Complaint #202203247,
May 2022
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Hispanic Male, 25-29 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
| Complainant: | Hispanic Male, 25-29 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
| Complainant: | Hispanic Male, 25-29 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
| Complainant: | Hispanic Male, 25-29 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Penalty: | Command Discipline - A |
| Complaint #202312059, December 2023 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises | Female, 18-20 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202205747, August 2022 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Age 40-44 | Closed - Pending Litigation |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202204727, July 2022 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property | Male, 40-44 | Unfounded |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name | Male, 40-44 | Unfounded |
| Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest | Male, 40-44 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card | Male, 40-44 | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP | ||
| Penalty: No penalty | ||
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202205003, July 2022 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Discourtesy: Word | Hispanic Male, 40-44 | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP | ||
| Penalty: No penalty | ||
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202203247, May 2022 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Hispanic Male, 25-29 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Discourtesy: Word | Hispanic Male, 25-29 | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Force: Physical force | Hispanic Male, 25-29 | Unfounded |
| Force: Physical force | Hispanic Male, 25-29 | Unable to Determine |
| Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises | Within NYPD Guidelines | |
| Penalty: Command Discipline - A | ||
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Discipline
Case: 2023-29494
Closed: 1/6/2024
Case Details:
- Violated patrol rules.
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A
Case: 2023-29501
Closed: 1/5/2024
Case Details:
- Wrongfully discourteous to an individual known to the Department.
Penalty: A - Command Discipline
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A
Case: 2023-29501
Closed: 1/5/2024
Case Details:
- Wrongfully discourteous to an individual known to the Department.
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A
Lawsuits
Collado, Stacey vs City of Ny, et al.Case # 714469/2022, Supreme Court - Queens, August 30, 2022, ended December 26, 2024
$35,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On April 13, 2021, P.O. SHEEHAN, JOHN, and JANE arrested Plaintiff. Plaintiff’s husband, Defendant DARSI, observed that Plaintiff was the victim of an unprovoked assault and had only taken justified and appropriate action in response to being assaulted. Despite Plaintiff informing P.O.s SHEEHAN, JOHN, and JANE that she did not commit the crime, P.O.s arrested Plaintiff without probable cause and falsely charged Plaintiff with Assault and harassment. Plaintiff was then placed into one of the cars at the scene and taken to the 104th Precinct. P.O. searched the Plaintiff’s person without her authority or permission. The plaintiff was later transferred to the Central Booking around 24 hours. Due to P.O.’s false sta...