Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusions.
Named in 2 known lawsuits, $300,000 total settlements.
Acosta, Ambar vs Enrique, Alberto, et al.
Case # 023191/2012E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, April 15, 2013, ended October 1, 2025
Administrative Closing
Complaint
Description: On or about September 17, 2011 Plaintiff was at her residence with her two infant children when POs Percoraro and Toland and the children's father arrived to execute a purported order and remove the children from Plaintiff's custody. The purported order was from Georgia, the father's home state, and was not valid in New York. Additionally, the order was a proposed ordered and unsigned, and therefore not a valid court order at all. Plaintiff suffered fear, acute anxiety, despair, humiliation, embarrassment, intimidation, loss of sleep, loss of appetite, and general feeling of listlessness as a result of this incident. It is unclear which listed allegations apply to this complaint.
Gomez, Jose vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 306094/2008,
Supreme Court - Bronx, November 13, 2008, ended May 15, 2015
$300,000 Settlement