Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Physical force
Force: Physical force
Alvin V. Joseph
Badge #3186,
Asian Male
Police Officer at 30th Precinct since May 2019
Service
started April 2018,
made $160,000 last year,
Tax #965764
Complaints
2
Complaints
9
Allegations
1
Substantiated
1
Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
1
Unable to Determine
4
Unfounded
3
Within NYPD Guidelines
Complaint #202307011,
July 2023
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Female, 60-64 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline B) |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Threat of summons |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 45-49 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording |
| Complainant: | Female, 60-64 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card |
| Complainant: | Female, 60-64 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 45-49 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| NYPD Conclusion: | No Disciplinary Action-DUP |
| Penalty: | No penalty |
Complaint #202303949,
May 2023
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Female, 60-64 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Allegation: | Offensive Language: Race |
| Complainant: | Female, 60-64 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Race) |
| Complainant: | Female, 60-64 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name |
| Complainant: | Female, 60-64 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Complaint #202307011, July 2023 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Female, 60-64 | Substantiated (Command Discipline B) |
| Abuse of Authority: Threat of summons | Black Male, 45-49 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording | Female, 60-64 | Unable to Determine |
| Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card | Female, 60-64 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property | Black Male, 45-49 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP | ||
| Penalty: No penalty | ||
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202303949, May 2023 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest | Female, 60-64 | Unfounded |
| Offensive Language: Race | Female, 60-64 | Unfounded |
| Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Race) | Female, 60-64 | Unfounded |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name | Female, 60-64 | Unfounded |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.