Yingkai Kong

Yingkai Kong

Yingkai Kong
Badge #11566, Asian Male
Police Officer at Vice Enforcement Squad Zone 2 since December 2024
Also served at 109th Precinct
Service started November 2020, made $84,300 last year, Tax #969864

Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Physical force
Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2022-26618
Closed: 10/11/2022

View Details

Complaints

3 Complaints
9 Allegations
3 Substantiated
2 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
1 Alleged Victim Uncooperative
1 Complainant Uncooperative
2 Unable to Determine
1 Unfounded
1 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202505270, May 2025
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Discourtesy: Action
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details

Complaint #202505629, February 2025
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat re: immigration status
Complainant: Age 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #202300836, January 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Alleged Victim Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #202505270, May 2025
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Discourtesy: Word Unable to Determine
Discourtesy: Action Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording Within NYPD Guidelines
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details
Complaint #202505629, February 2025
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat re: immigration status Age 40-44 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #202300836, January 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Male, 35-39 Complainant Uncooperative
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Male, 35-39 Alleged Victim Uncooperative
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2022-26618
Closed: 10/11/2022
Case Details:
  1. Failure to respond to overdose incident
Penalty: Instructions
Recommendation: Command Discipline - B