Michelle Figueroa

Michelle Figueroa

Michelle Figueroa
Lieutenant at 63rd Precinct since May 2025
Also served at 61st Precinct
Service started July 2010, made $143,000 last year, Tax #948964
Hispanic Female

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2020-22057
Closed: 8/3/2022
Case: 1 Allegation

View Details

Lawsuit Settlements:
$25,000   Pretto, Marvin an Infant By Mng Pretto-Lavaux, Linda vs City of New York, et al., 2014 KCSC KCSC 001391/2014
$400,000   Gaskin, Andrew vs City of New York, et al., 2014 KCSC KCSC 021163/2013
View Details

Complaints

5 Complaints
9 Allegations
2 Substantiated
2 Substantiated (Charges)
3 Exonerated
2 SRAD Closure
1 Unfounded
1 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #202605269, May 2026
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
CCRB Conclusion: SRAD Closure
additional details

Complaint #202412720, November 2024
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat re: removal to hospital
Complainant: Female, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: SRAD Closure
additional details

Complaint #202001004, January 2020
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital
Complainant: White Male, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #201810315, December 2018
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises
Complainant: White Female, 48
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Complainant: White Female, 48
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital
Complainant: White Female, 48
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: White Female, 48
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
NYPD Conclusion: APU Dismissed
APU Plea Penalty: Reprimand
APU Case Status: Closed: Plea set aside, Without discipline, February 13, 2023
Penalty: Dismissed
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Plea Agreement
additional details

Complaint #201310309, October 2013
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Female, 44
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #202605269, May 2026
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest SRAD Closure
additional details
Complaint #202412720, November 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat re: removal to hospital Female, 45-49 SRAD Closure
additional details
Complaint #202001004, January 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital White Male, 50-54 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #201810315, December 2018
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises White Female, 48 Substantiated (Charges)
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises White Female, 48 Substantiated (Charges)
Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital White Female, 48 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card White Female, 48 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Exonerated
NYPD Conclusion: APU Dismissed
APU Plea Penalty: Reprimand
APU Case Status: Closed: Plea set aside, Without discipline, February 13, 2023
Penalty: Dismissed
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Plea Agreement
additional details
Complaint #201310309, October 2013
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Female, 44 Exonerated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'SRAD Closure': Strategic Resource Allocation Determination - due to citywide budget cuts, CCRB is no longer able to fully investigate certain cases within its jurisdiction and suspended investigating some types of complaints.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2020-22057
Closed: 8/3/2022
Case Details:
  1. Improper use of body worn camera
Penalty: Training
Recommendation: Training

Case Details:
  1. Failed to properly supervise.
Recommendation: Charges and Specifications


Lawsuits

Named in 2 known lawsuits, $425,000 total settlements.

Pretto, Marvin an Infant By Mng Pretto-Lavaux, Linda vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 001391/2014, Supreme Court - Kings, February 6, 2014, ended November 30, 2017
$25,000 Settlement

Gaskin, Andrew vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 021163/2013, Supreme Court - Kings, January 16, 2014, ended December 20, 2016
$400,000 Settlement

Other Documents

Brooklyn DA Disclosure Letter references additional lawsuit 13691/2014