Harryson Cothias

Harryson Cothias

Harryson Cothias
Badge #1765, Black Male
Police Officer at 41st Precinct since April 2022
Service started October 2021, made $77,000 last year, Tax #973074

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera (2)
Untruthful Statement: Misleading official statement

Complaints

4 Complaints
13 Allegations
5 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
1 Substantiated (Charges)
2 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
2 Alleged Victim Uncooperative
1 OMB PEG Directive Closure
4 Unable to Determine
1 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202411461, November 2024
Allegation: Force: Hit against inanimate object
Complainant: Black Female, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Alleged Victim Uncooperative
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Female, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Alleged Victim Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #202407112, July 2024
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Male, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: OMB PEG Directive Closure
additional details

Complaint #202401734, February 2024
Allegation: Force: Vehicle
Complainant: Black Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Untruthful Statement: Misleading official statement
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Black Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details

Complaint #202401079, January 2024
Allegation: Force: Hit against inanimate object
Complainant: Black Female, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Complainant: Female, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Female, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Offensive Language: Other
Complainant: Black Female, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Female, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Black Female, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Retained, with discipline
APU Case Status: Closed: Retained, with discipline, August 1, 2025
Penalty: Command Discipline A 1 days
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Case Retained Letter
additional details

Complaint #202411461, November 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Hit against inanimate object Black Female, 35-39 Alleged Victim Uncooperative
Force: Physical force Black Female, 35-39 Alleged Victim Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #202407112, July 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Male, 55-59 OMB PEG Directive Closure
additional details
Complaint #202401734, February 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Vehicle Black Male, 45-49 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Male, 45-49 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Untruthful Statement: Misleading official statement Substantiated (Charges)
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Black Male, 45-49 Within NYPD Guidelines
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details
Complaint #202401079, January 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Hit against inanimate object Black Female, 40-44 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Female, 40-44 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Discourtesy: Word Black Female, 40-44 Unable to Determine
Offensive Language: Other Black Female, 40-44 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Female, 40-44 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Black Female, 40-44 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Retained, with discipline
APU Case Status: Closed: Retained, with discipline, August 1, 2025
Penalty: Command Discipline A 1 days
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Case Retained Letter
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'OMB PEG Directive Closure': Due to citywide budget cuts, CCRB is no longer able to fully investigate certain cases within its jurisdiction and suspended investigating some types of complaints.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.