Joseph T. Zerella

Joseph T. Zerella

Joseph T. Zerella
Badge #1972, White Male
Detective Specialist at Emergency Service Squad 07 since March 2024
Also served at Emergency Services Unit, Patrol Borough Brooklyn North, Patrol Borough Brooklyn North Public Safety Teams, 75th Precinct, Emergency Service Squad 08
Service started January 2016, made $169,000 last year, Tax #961474

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Question
Untruthful Statement: False official statement

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2022-27352
Closed: 6/22/2023

View Details

Lawsuit Settlements:
$30,000   Cadet, Maurin vs City of Ny, et al., 2022 KCSC KCSC 518852/2022
$50,000   Blake-Mathews, Jordan K., vs City of New York, et al., 2020 KCSC KCSC 524739/2020
View Details

Complaints

6 Complaints
13 Allegations
2 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Charges)
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
2 Alleged Victim Unavailable
1 Closed - Pending Litigation
2 Complaint Withdrawn
1 Unfounded
1 Unsubstantiated
4 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202303494, April 2023
Allegation: Force: Gun Pointed
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Force: Gun Pointed
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Force: Gun Pointed
Complainant: Black Male, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Force: Gun Pointed
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202103954, June 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Untruthful Statement: False official statement
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Retained, without discipline
APU Case Status: Closed: Retained, without discipline, December 28, 2022
Penalty: Dismissed
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202100992, January 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
CCRB Conclusion: Alleged Victim Unavailable
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises
CCRB Conclusion: Alleged Victim Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #202004159, June 2020
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #202003663, May 2020
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Black Male, 22
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Black Male, 22
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
additional details

Complaint #201805540, June 2018
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #202303494, April 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Gun Pointed Black Male, 30-34 Within NYPD Guidelines
Force: Gun Pointed Black Male, 18-20 Within NYPD Guidelines
Force: Gun Pointed Black Male, 55-59 Within NYPD Guidelines
Force: Gun Pointed Black Male, 30-34 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202103954, June 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Question Black Male, 21-24 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Untruthful Statement: False official statement Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Retained, without discipline
APU Case Status: Closed: Retained, without discipline, December 28, 2022
Penalty: Dismissed
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #202100992, January 2021
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Alleged Victim Unavailable
Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises Alleged Victim Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #202004159, June 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Black Male, 30-34 Unsubstantiated
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 30-34 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #202003663, May 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Black Male, 22 Complaint Withdrawn
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Black Male, 22 Complaint Withdrawn
additional details
Complaint #201805540, June 2018
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2022-27352
Closed: 6/22/2023
Case Details:
  1. Made false statements during a civilian complaint review board interview.
  2. Wrongfully questioned an individual known to the Department.
Penalty: Training
Recommendation: No disciplinary action


Lawsuits

Named in 4 known lawsuits, $80,000 total settlements.

Cadet, Maurin vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 518852/2022, Supreme Court - Kings, July 5, 2022, ended February 26, 2025
$30,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On January 1, 2021, at approximately 3:00 a.m., Plaintiff Maurin Cadet was present in the vicinity of 796 Putnam Avenue in Kings County, when Defendant NYPD Police Officers unlawfully assaulted Plaintiff. Defendant Officer, whose identity is not known, approached Plaintiff and without warning or reason, punched Plaintiff in the face. Defendant Officers threw Plaintiff onto the ground, handcuffed him, brought him to a police vehicle and transported him to the 75th Precinct. Plaintiff requested medical attention but was denied, and spent approximately 24 hours in custody at Central Booking. Defendant Police Officers provided the Kings County District Attorney's Office with false, misleading or incomplete informat...

Chowdhury, Shaiful vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 21CV00962, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, March 23, 2021, ended January 5, 2026
Zero Disposition
Complaint
Description: On February 23, 2020, Plaintiff Shaiful Chowdhury called the police in response to a robbery in an apartment complex he owned. Defendants Pliwiak, Zerella, Santana, Tasevoli, Mastorardi, Calhoun, Elliot, McSherry, Lt. Cain, and John Does #1-5 conducted a search and investigated in response to the robbery. Throughout the search, Defendants found a quantity of Marijuana in the third-floor apartment. Plaintiff was the owner of the property, but the Marijuana was discovered in an apartment that had recently been rented and occupied by an unrelated tenant. Despite Plaintiff's limited access to the apartment, defendants, including but not limited to Detectives Santana, Tasevoli, and Mastorardi, made flagrantly racist...

Blake-Mathews, Jordan K., vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 524739/2020, Supreme Court - Kings, December 22, 2020, ended January 14, 2025
$50,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On January 22, 2020, Plaintiff was lawfully present when he was approached by officer Joseph Zerella and certain unnamed officers. The officers tackled him to the ground, jumped on him, beat him, pushed him into the pavement, and forcefully handcuffed him. Plaintiff was taken to the 7th Precinct, and later the hospital due to his injuries.

D., J. By M/n/g Lawson, Tamara vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 511416/2020, Supreme Court - Kings, July 2, 2020
Complaint
Description: On April 15, 2018, at or around 8:00 a.m., the minor PLAINTIFF was lawfully within the vicinity of 516 Bristol Street. PLAINTIFF was in the residence with his grandmother and his brother. Defendants, Including EISERT and DOEs, unlawfully entered and searched the residence including PLAINTIFF’S room. Defendants recovered no contraband from PLAINTIFF or the residence. Defendants had no probable cause to believe that PLAINTIFF had committed any crimes or offenses, defendants placed PLAINTIFF into handcuffs and under arrest. PLAINTIFF was subsequently transported to the police precinct where he was interrogated, photographed, and fingerprinted. Defendants sent false allegations to the Kings County Family Court Pro...

Other Documents