Hasan C. Elci

Badge #3847, White Male
Former Detective Grade 3 at Detective Borough Brooklyn Operations
Also served at 46th Precinct, Narcotics Borough Brooklyn North, 60th Precinct Detective Squad
Service started July 1996, ended April 2024, Tax #917574

Substantiated Allegations:
Discourtesy: Word
Untruthful Statement: False official statement

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2022-25606
Closed: 11/21/2022
Case: 2022-25607
Closed: 10/18/2022

View Details

Lawsuit Settlements:
$25,000   Coleman, Doyle vs Rice, Alexis, et al., 2015 KCSC KCSC 000445/2015
$30,000   Medina v. The City of New York, EDNY EDNY 10CV03158
$35,000   Shamblee v. The City of New York et al, EDNY EDNY 11CV03848
View Details

Complaints

3 Complaints
5 Allegations
2 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Charges)
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Unfounded
2 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #202006159, August 2020
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Force: Hit against inanimate object
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Untruthful Statement: False official statement
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 20 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, February 27, 2024
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 20 days
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Plea Agreement
additional details

Complaint #200912586, August 2009
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 44
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200401184, February 2004
Allegation: Discourtesy: Demeanor/tone
Complainant: Black Female, 47
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #202006159, August 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 18-20 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Force: Hit against inanimate object Black Male, 18-20 Unsubstantiated
Untruthful Statement: False official statement Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 20 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, February 27, 2024
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 20 days
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Plea Agreement
additional details
Complaint #200912586, August 2009
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 44 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #200401184, February 2004
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Demeanor/tone Black Female, 47 Unfounded
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2022-25606
Closed: 11/21/2022
Case Details:
  1. Pleaded Guilty: Made false statements during a civilian complaint review board interview.
Penalty: Vacation days (20 days)

Case: 2022-25607
Closed: 10/18/2022
Case Details:
  1. Failed to make required entries in Department logs.
Recommendation: Other


Lawsuits

Named in 4 known lawsuits, $90,000 total settlements.

Kantor, Alexander vs Air Atlantic Medical Pc, et al.
Case # 523901/2018, Supreme Court - Kings, September 19, 2019
Complaint
Description: It is understood that the plaintiff commenced his employment at defendant's office on September 28, 2016. Plaintiff's job was to provide various supplies and furnishings for the office with his own funds and the office would reimburse him at the end of each month. Subsequently the plaintiff discovered that the defendants were engaging in criminal, fraudulent, and unethical activities. The defendants requested that the plaintiff participate in said criminal activities and the plaintiff declined. Thereafter the defendants failed to pay the agreed upon reimbursement. As a retaliatory tactic, the defendants falsely accused the plaintiff of theft and reported him to the NYPD. The plaintiff was detained and prosecute...

Coleman, Doyle vs Rice, Alexis, et al.
Case # 000445/2015, Supreme Court - Kings, January 20, 2015, ended May 6, 2019
$25,000 Settlement

Medina v. The City of New York
Case # 10CV03158, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY
$30,000 Settlement
Amended Complaint
Description: Officers rushed into apartment where Plaintiffs were fixing the locks and assaulted them. Officers found no contraband but took plaintiffs to the 70th precinct, denied them medical attention, strip searched them and released them without charges.

Shamblee v. The City of New York et al
Case # 11CV03848, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY
$35,000 Settlement
Amended Complaint