Conclusion Meanings:
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Perkins, John vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 151663/2016,
Supreme Court - Richmond, December 13, 2016, ended February 19, 2025
$45,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On or about December 3, 2015, at approximately 11am Plaintiff was at or near the premises located at 24 Maxie Court located in the County of Richmond, City of New York, when he became the victim of police retaliation and/or police misconduct. Plaintiff was the lawful owner and landlord of 24 Maxie Court since the year 2007. At the aforementioned time and place, Mr. Perkins was threatened, chased and charged by the tenant who had been living in the downstairs apartment. Plaintiff became a victim of violence when tenant and tenant’s boyfriend attacked him. Plaintiff immediately called 911 to seek help and protection, and Defendant NYPD Officers Michael Birch, Golden Derrick, and John Does 1-4 responded and arrive...