Conclusion Meanings:
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Named in 5 known lawsuits, $42,500 total settlements.
Belton, Marcus vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 802098/2026E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, February 2, 2026, ended June 10, 2026
$35,000 Settlement
Muhammad, Bilal vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 800119/2026E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, January 6, 2026
Mota, Jose vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 825404/2025E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, December 8, 2025
Ryan, Jaylin vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 25CV03141,
U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, July 8, 2025, ended October 21, 2025
Zero Disposition
Jimenez, Kelvin vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 814546/2023E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, September 22, 2023, ended January 29, 2025
$7,500 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On July 11, 2023, Defendant Medina approached Plaintiff
KELVIN JIMENEZ for no reason, and based on fraud, perjury and misrepresentations, and summarily stopped, searched, grabbed, assaulted, battered, and detained him in an aggressive and excessive manner. The Plaintiff while lawfully in the vicinity of West 181st Street and Jerome Avenue, was without just cause, probable cause or provocation, maliciously, intentionally and falsely accused by Medina of having committed a crime. Plaintiff was lawfully in the above vicinity when he was stopped, questioned, searched and seized solely on the basis of his age and/or race
and for no legal or legitimate reason.
Plaintiff was then taken to the police station. Plainti...