Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Named in 4 known lawsuits, $50,000 total settlements.
Joachim, Denzel vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 166638/2025,
Supreme Court - New York, April 16, 2026
Joachim, Denzel vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 803564/2026E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, April 16, 2026
Ryan, Charles vs City of Ny
Case # 160861/2023,
Supreme Court - New York, November 8, 2023, ended June 13, 2024
$50,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On January 5, 2023, police officer Edward Sacco (Shield No. 962), Gergory Perez (Sheild No. 6507), and other police officers without a warrant, stopped, searched, grabbed, assaulted, battered, and detained him in an aggressive and excessive manner.
Croskey, Kashiff vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 154126/2022E,
Supreme Court - New York, May 17, 2022
Complaint
Description: Note: this complaint contains no particulars of the how, by whom and where the alleged torts were conducted other than by general reference to a date and conduct. The city filed a demand for particulars which appears to have gone unanswered. The following are the causes of action listed by the Plaintiff, followed by the NYPD officers named in the complaint.
On September 17, 2020, the NYPD Defendants wrongfully and falsely accused the Plaintiff of Attempted Tampering with Physical Evidence. The Plaintiff was detained without probable cause and held at the 30th Precinct and later at the 42nd Precinct. The Plaintiff was unlawfully searched and strip searched. The NYPD Defendants provided false and/or incomplete ...